I like endorsed better than recommended.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Sande Gilda" <sgilda(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 3:57:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>
>
> Legal have approved the badge, but would prefer we don't use
> supported.
>
>
> They are happy with recommended or endorsed.
>
>
> Endorsed works well for my British English brain, but does it work
> for other versions of English?
>
> On 3 Sep 2012, at 14:26, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>
>
> As no one has more comments, we'll go with the bottom left.
>
> I'll work with legal on the wording.
>
> On 30 Aug 2012, at 14:18, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>
>
> Here it is on white :-)
>
>
>
> On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:03, Sande Gilda wrote:
>
>
>
> I like the bottom left too. I like keeping it in sync with the look
> and feel of the web site. I wonder how it would look on a white
> background though. Does it need a boundary?
>
> Not sure about the supported either. :-)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: "Pete Muir" < pmuir(a)redhat.com >
>
>
> To: "Marius Bogoevici" < mariusb(a)redhat.com >
>
>
> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:58:04 AM
>
>
> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> James P has started to develop some designs for this:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I really like the bottom left (though it's possible that supported is
>
>
> not the right term, perhaps "Recommended" or "Certified" is
better?)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:08, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Exactly why I like Jason's proposal of using the JDF logo explicitly.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2012-07-10, at 11:07 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well we want to rate them based on their level of affiliation, not on
>
>
> their quality or difficulty.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:04, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Something based on the JDF logo would be better. I don't think we
>
>
> want to *rate* examples, we just want to indicate their degree of
>
>
> affiliation with jdf.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2012-07-10, at 10:25 AM, Jason Porter wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What about rendering the jdf "logo" as a stamp? with some specs on it
>
>
> or ink areas missing?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Pete Muir" < pmuir(a)redhat.com >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: "Jonathan Fuerth" < jfuerth(a)redhat.com >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:53:37 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That could work.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'll see if I can do some mockups.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10 Jul 2012, at 14:50, Jonathan Fuerth wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> A gold starburst "Official Supported JBoss Demo" would convey this
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> idea to me. Kind of like the Nintendo Seal of Quality.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As for the lesser-supported scenarios, I'm not sure we need a mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> for that. The absence of the official seal might be enough.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Or, if the supported demos get an Official Seal, maybe the
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> in-the-works demos could get the industrious Soon-to-be-official
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Beaver of Quality, and the unsupported demos could get the
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> completely unofficial Otter of Quality. (ha, ha, ha.. OK, I'll
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> stop now.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Pete Muir" < pmuir(a)redhat.com >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:08:45 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Subject: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We need a visual metaphor that quickly conveys to people that an
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> example is:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * official, and something we will stand by, answer questions on,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> support in a product (e.g. TicketMonster)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * something that we plan to add to as an official example later on
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (e.g. jbossworld keynote 2012)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * something that is really interesting, but is unlikely to be
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> official (e.g. Vineet's example)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We had thought about using ski run colours (green circle, blue
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> square, black diamond) to indicate the level, but they really
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> refer more to difficulty than to recommendation. Anyone got any
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> good ideas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Pete
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jdf-dev mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jdf-dev mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jdf-dev mailing list
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> jdf-dev mailing list
>
>
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev