Supported is a massively overloaded word ;-)
On 29 Aug 2012, at 22:56, Jason Porter wrote:
> Endorsed to me means something slightly different than supported. Supported to me
would be either we created or we test and can fix it if something goes wrong. Endorsed
would be we've gone through it and approve of everything in there, but we're not
"offering support" for it. I would use "endorsed" for community
contributed things (examples, guides, etc) and supported for things we authored internally
or have taken over the ownership.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:41:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>
>> I like Endorsed
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:03, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> we actually have the exact same challenge in tooling land - the
>>> trouble of classifying what "status"
>>> an external plugin has for us/users.
>>>
>>> We currently use the term "Certified" and "Selected" as
the way to
>>> say which we support/can help fix things on and "selected" being
>>> those
>>> we at least tested at some point but might have changed since then.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:58, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> James P has started to develop some designs for this:
>>>>
>>>> <JDFApproved3.jpg>
>>>>
>>>> I really like the bottom left (though it's possible that supported
>>>> is not the right term, perhaps "Recommended" or
"Certified" is
>>>> better?)
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:08, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Exactly why I like Jason's proposal of using the JDF logo
>>>>> explicitly.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2012-07-10, at 11:07 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well we want to rate them based on their level of affiliation,
>>>>>> not on their quality or difficulty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:04, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something based on the JDF logo would be better. I don't
think
>>>>>>> we want to *rate* examples, we just want to indicate their
>>>>>>> degree of affiliation with jdf.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2012-07-10, at 10:25 AM, Jason Porter wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What about rendering the jdf "logo" as a stamp?
with some
>>>>>>>> specs on it or ink areas missing?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>> To: "Jonathan Fuerth"
<jfuerth(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:53:37 AM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual)
metaphor
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That could work.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll see if I can do some mockups.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 14:50, Jonathan Fuerth wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A gold starburst "Official Supported JBoss
Demo" would
>>>>>>>>>> convey this
>>>>>>>>>> idea to me. Kind of like the Nintendo Seal of
Quality.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As for the lesser-supported scenarios, I'm
not sure we need
>>>>>>>>>> a mark
>>>>>>>>>> for that. The absence of the official seal might
be enough.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or, if the supported demos get an Official Seal,
maybe the
>>>>>>>>>> in-the-works demos could get the industrious
>>>>>>>>>> Soon-to-be-official
>>>>>>>>>> Beaver of Quality, and the unsupported demos
could get the
>>>>>>>>>> completely unofficial Otter of Quality. (ha, ha,
ha.. OK,
>>>>>>>>>> I'll
>>>>>>>>>> stop now.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Pete Muir"
<pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>>>>>> To: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:08:45 AM
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual)
metaphor
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We need a visual metaphor that quickly conveys to
people
>>>>>>>>>> that an
>>>>>>>>>> example is:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * official, and something we will stand by,
answer questions
>>>>>>>>>> on,
>>>>>>>>>> support in a product (e.g. TicketMonster)
>>>>>>>>>> * something that we plan to add to as an official
example
>>>>>>>>>> later on
>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. jbossworld keynote 2012)
>>>>>>>>>> * something that is really interesting, but is
unlikely to
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> official (e.g. Vineet's example)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We had thought about using ski run colours (green
circle,
>>>>>>>>>> blue
>>>>>>>>>> square, black diamond) to indicate the level, but
they
>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>> refer more to difficulty than to recommendation.
Anyone got
>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>> good ideas?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev