]
Michal Babacek commented on MODCLUSTER-393:
-------------------------------------------
(Actually [~pferraro] is the author of the class in question, so I might have picked a
wrong assignee...)
One can't change history and decay with
DynamicLoadBalanceFactorProvider
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: MODCLUSTER-393
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/MODCLUSTER-393
Project: mod_cluster
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.2.6.Final
Reporter: Michal Babacek
Assignee: Radoslav Husar
Priority: Critical
Attachments: redacted_log
I'm under an ugly impression that one can't actually change {{history}} and
{{decay}} attributes of *DynamicLoadBalanceFactorProvider*.
I was trying to figure out why the new test suite of CustomLoadMetric tests does not
pass. In order to get load figures without history and decay manipulation, I set the
following:
{code}
<subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:modcluster:1.2">
<mod-cluster-config advertise-socket="modcluster"
connector="ajp">
<dynamic-load-provider history="0">
<custom-load-metric class="biz.karms.modcluster.CustomLoadMetric"
weight="1">
<property name="capacity" value="1000"/>
<property name="loadfile"
value="/tmp/mod_cluster-eapx/loadfileA"/>
<property name="parseexpression" value="^LOAD:
([0-9]*)$"/>
</custom-load-metric>
</dynamic-load-provider>
</mod-cluster-config>
</subsystem>
{code}
The aforementioned {{history=0}} effectively means that there is just 1 "slot"
for a one historical value on which decay function should work.
If you take a look at the code in
[
DynamicLoadBalanceFactorProvider|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_cluste...]
constructor, it is apparent
that the size of the List that later serves for storing the historical values is set
sooner than the actual [setHistory(int
history)|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_cluster/blob/master/core/src/m...]
method is called.
The actual size of that List collection wouldn't do any harm by itself but it is
being used in the aforementioned class with {{.size()}} to control cycles.
The same IMHO holds for the decay attribute.
Anyhow, I put some additional logging to the
[
DynamicLoadBalanceFactorProvider.java|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_c...]:
{code}
// Historical value contribute an exponentially decayed factor
for (int i = 0; i < queue.size(); ++i) {
double decay = 1 / Math.pow(decayFactor, i);
totalDecay += decay;
this.log.info("KTAG: totalLoad:"+totalLoad+", with
decay:"+(totalLoad+queue.get(i).doubleValue() * decay));
totalLoad += queue.get(i).doubleValue() * decay;
}
{code}
and
{code}
try {
// Normalize load with respect to capacity
this.recordLoad(metricLoadHistory, metric.getLoad(engine) / metric.getCapacity());
this.log.info("KTAG metricLoadHistory:"+metricLoadHistory.toString());
totalWeight += weight;
totalWeightedLoad += this.average(metricLoadHistory) * weight;
} catch (Exception e) {
this.log.error(e.getLocalizedMessage(), e);
}
{code}
with the following being the output: [^redacted_log].
So, despite having {{history=0}}, which should force the system to keep just 1, the
current value, {{metricLoadHistory}} grew from
{noformat}
KTAG metricLoadHistory:[0.8]
{noformat}
to
{noformat}
KTAG metricLoadHistory:[0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 0.8]
{noformat}
which is exactly
[
9|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_cluster/blob/master/core/src/main/jav...]
+
[
1|https://github.com/modcluster/mod_cluster/blob/master/core/src/main/jav...]
in size :-)
WDYT?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: