3 p.m.
Hi,
there are some Undertow performance benchmarks like [1]. Is any perf.
comparison between Undertow and Jetty available somewhere?
Thanks
Vojta
[1] http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r6&hw=ec2&tes...
3:21 p.m.
I did an internal comparison awhile back that had Undertow, depending on scenario,
anywhere from 15 - 85% better throughput than Jetty 9.
On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
3:40 p.m.
Do you have some more details on the benchmark?
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: Jason Greene <jason.greene(a)redhat.com>
An: Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek(a)redhat.com>
CC: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Gesendet: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 16:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
Betreff: Re: [undertow-dev] Undertow vs. Jetty perf. benchmark
I did an internal comparison awhile back that had Undertow, depending on scenario,
anywhere from 15 - 85% better throughput than Jetty 9.
On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev
3:52 p.m.
Sure. It was testing raw GET throughput (returning fixed content) of traditional Servlets
using standalone Jetty vs standalone Undertow. Response size was 11b -> 1mb.
On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Norman Maurer <nmaurer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
4173
days inactive
4173
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Jason Greene -
Norman Maurer -
Vojtech Juranek