We do publish tests-jars, so you can actually use DefaultServer,
however I agree that this is not really ideal.
I think the ideal solution would be to take the core functionality
from DefaultServer and create a new repo (undertow-test-runner) and
create some kind of UndertowRunner class that is based on
DefaultServer. Does this sound reasonable?
Stuart
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Bill O'Neil <bill(a)dartalley.com> wrote:
Hello,
How would you recommend testing custom HttpHanders? The DefaultServer class
in core part of the test code so it is not included in the jar for reuse.
Would it be reasonable to pull testing utils into their own project so it
can be reused? Or would you recommend just mocking a HttpServerExchange and
passing that to the HttpHandler?
Thanks,
Bill
_______________________________________________
undertow-dev mailing list
undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev