10:14 a.m.
Thanks for the update Matthias!
On 18.11.2014, at 17:04, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Hi thomas,
here is an update on the actual issue:
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/124#issuecomment-63493965
I will file a PR for that
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com> wrote:
Hi Matthias,
java version "1.7.0_71"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14)
OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode)
(I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I didn’t configure
anything specific).
Cheers,
T
On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to reproduce
it, but she is currently running on an older Java version (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a
newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun her tests.
>
> In the meantime, what is your version?
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output:
>
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> what JDK version do you have ?
>
> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk
>
> I am unable to reproduce this behavior....
>
> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS:
>
>
>
> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12",
"XXXX").withProductionDestination()
>
>
> and I give it too tokens:
> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id)
>
> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the ordering of the
tokens does not matter ..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Adding a test as you suggested Matt
> see:
https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.var...
> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed variant list”
and line 68 content invalid dev certificate.
>
> the output is:
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN
>
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d
> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0
>
> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, failure, retry
etc..
>
> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid token.
>
> @matthias does it help?
>
> ++
> Corinne
>
>
> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
> > Hi Corrine,
> >
> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns...
> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing
tokens).
> >
> > here is some code snippets:
> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code
> >
> >
> > perhaps like:
> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de
> >
> >
> >
> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087
> >
> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution
certificate
> >
> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations:
> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate
> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate
> >
> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD
variant received the notification.
> >
> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a
Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification
> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate
thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I
also confirm that the work around does work.
> >
> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is
called:
> >
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/...
> >
> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server
locally to test further.
> >
> > ++
> > Corinne
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x
installations" :
> > >
> > > <installation.png>
> > >
> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off.
> > >
> > > Sebi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI
;-)
> > >
> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin
UI?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Aerogear-users mailing list
> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> Aerogear-users mailing list
> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users