Hi! does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant? -Matthias On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > Hello, > > after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have > now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices. > > When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web > console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly. > > But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get > sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are > received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already > published in the store - same problem. > > >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I’m > testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push > registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production > variants, so the devices are definitely registering. > > The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the > production variant). I’m sending the same message. > > Any idea what could be wrong? > > Cheers, > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

Hi Matthias, by “token", I assume you mean “device token”? With the 2 apps in question, I never registered a development variant, only a production variant per app. One side effect of this could have been that during testing my development devices (running a debug build, i.e. not one downloaded from the app store) registered its device token on the production variant. I’m not not sure whether my situation is similar to the one described in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1087 - If that’s the source of my problem, is there a workaround? Should I delete my development token(s) from the DB to solve the issue temporarily? (I’ve got a pretty important app launch coming up, where I want to push to 65.000 devices…)

Cheers, Thomas On 16.11.2014, at 09:30, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: Hi! does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant? -Matthias On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > Hello, > > after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I have > now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices. > > When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the web > console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices properly. > > But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get > sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are > received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already > published in the store - same problem. > > >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I’m > testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push > registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production > variants, so the devices are definitely registering. > > The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for the > production variant). I’m sending the same message. > > Any idea what could be wrong? > > Cheers, > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

On 17.11.2014, at 08:28, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: Should I delete my development token(s) from the DB to solve the issue temporarily? (I’ve got a pretty important app launch coming up, where I want to push to 65.000 devices…) yes, I think that's the work-around. thanks is it enough to DELETE FROM Installation WHERE deviceToken = “<MyDevDeviceToken>" or do i need to delete or update anything else? thx t We will be looking into this! > > Cheers, > Thomas > > > On 16.11.2014, at 09:30, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > Hi! > > does the production variant contain tokens from the development variant? > > -Matthias > > On Saturday, November 15, 2014, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> after upgrading to the latest AeroGear UnifiedPush Server version, I >> have now problems sending push notifications to iOS devices. >> >> When I select a development variant, I can send notifications via the >> web console, and they are received on the iOS (development) devices >> properly. >> >> But when I select a production variant, the notifications seem to get >> sent (I see no errors in the web console), and NO notifications are >> received on the devices. I tested this with two different apps already >> published in the store - same problem. >> >> >From what I can tell, there should be no difference between the app I’m >> testing on the dev variant, and the two apps in the store - the push >> registration is the same, and I can see installations for the 2 production >> variants, so the devices are definitely registering. >> >> The only difference is the number of receivers (4 for the dev, 50 for >> the production variant). I’m sending the same message. >> >> Any idea what could be wrong? >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Aerogear-users mailing list >> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> > > > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-)

On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: Hi Thomas, You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" : <installation.png> ​ From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. Sebi On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-) Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI? _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

Hi Corrine, thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns... Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing tokens). here is some code snippets: https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code

I am currently on a train with a bad connection On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello all > > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087 > > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with > Distribution certificate > > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations: > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate > - on iPad2 with dev certificate > > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the > PROD variant received the notification. > > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent > again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received > the notification > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate > thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the > notification. I also confirm that the work around does work. > > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is > called: > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/... > > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS > server locally to test further. > > ++ > Corinne > > > > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x > installations" : > > > > <installation.png> > > ​ > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. > > > > Sebi > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; > wrote: > > > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI > ;-) > > > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin > UI? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aerogear-users mailing list > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aerogear-users mailing list > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Adding a test as you suggested Matt see: https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.var... Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed variant list” and line 68 content invalid dev certificate. the output is: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, failure, retry etc.. however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid token. @matthias does it help? ++ Corinne > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > Hi Corrine, > > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns... > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing tokens). > > here is some code snippets: > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code > > > perhaps like: > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de > > > > I am currently on a train with a bad connection > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello all > > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087 > > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution certificate > > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations: > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate > - on iPad2 with dev certificate > > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD variant received the notification. > > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work. > > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is called: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/... > > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server locally to test further. > > ++ > Corinne > > > > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" : > > > > <installation.png> > > ​ > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. > > > > Sebi > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-) > > > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aerogear-users mailing list > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aerogear-users mailing list > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

Adding a test as you suggested Matt see: https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.var... Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed variant list” and line 68 content invalid dev certificate. the output is: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, failure, retry etc.. however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid token. @matthias does it help? ++ Corinne > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > Hi Corrine, > > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on java-apns... > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like mixing tokens). > > here is some code snippets: > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code > > > perhaps like: > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de > > > > I am currently on a train with a bad connection > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hello all > > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087 > > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with Distribution certificate > > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations: > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate > - on iPad2 with dev certificate > > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the PROD variant received the notification. > > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini received the notification > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work. > > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback is called: > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/... > > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS server locally to test further. > > ++ > Corinne > > > > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > > Hi Thomas, > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x installations" : > > > > <installation.png> > > ​ > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. > > > > Sebi > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin UI ;-) > > > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the admin UI? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aerogear-users mailing list > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Aerogear-users mailing list > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>> messageSendFailed[B@143f032d :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > what JDK version do you have ? > > I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk > > I am unable to reproduce this behavior.... > > I have a connection to prod-stage from APS: > > > > .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12", > "XXXX").withProductionDestination() > > > and I give it too tokens: > iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) > iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) > > Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the > ordering of the tokens does not matter .. > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Adding a test as you suggested Matt >> see: >> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.var... >> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed >> variant list” and line 68 content invalid dev certificate. >> >> the output is: >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN >> >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 >> >> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, >> failure, retry etc.. >> >> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the valid >> token. >> >> @matthias does it help? >> >> ++ >> Corinne >> >> >> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < >> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >> > Hi Corrine, >> > >> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on >> java-apns... >> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like >> mixing tokens). >> > >> > here is some code snippets: >> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code >> > >> > >> > perhaps like: >> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de >> > >> > >> > >> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych < >> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> > Hello all >> > >> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087 >> > >> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with >> Distribution certificate >> > >> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations: >> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate >> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate >> > >> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the >> PROD variant received the notification. >> > >> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and >> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini >> received the notification >> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid >> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not >> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work. >> > >> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback >> is called: >> > >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/... >> > >> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a UPS >> server locally to test further. >> > >> > ++ >> > Corinne >> > >> > >> > >> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Thomas, >> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x >> installations" : >> > > >> > > <installation.png> >> > > ​ >> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. >> > > >> > > Sebi >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin >> UI ;-) >> > > >> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the >> admin UI? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Aerogear-users mailing list >> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Aerogear-users mailing list >> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Aerogear-users mailing list >> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Hi Matthias, java version "1.7.0_71" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14) OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode) (I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I didn’t configure anything specific). Cheers, T On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: Thomas, I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun her tests. In the meantime, what is your version? Greetings, Matthias On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output: > > :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent > :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent > :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: INVALID_TOKEN > :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>> > messageSendFailed[B@143f032d > :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> what JDK version do you have ? >> >> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk >> >> I am unable to reproduce this behavior.... >> >> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS: >> >> >> >> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12", >> "XXXX").withProductionDestination() >> >> >> and I give it too tokens: >> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) >> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) >> >> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the >> ordering of the tokens does not matter .. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt >>> see: >>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.var... >>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed >>> variant list” and line 68 content invalid dev certificate. >>> >>> the output is: >>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: >>> INVALID_TOKEN >>> >>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d >>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 >>> >>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, >>> failure, retry etc.. >>> >>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the >>> valid token. >>> >>> @matthias does it help? >>> >>> ++ >>> Corinne >>> >>> >>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>> > Hi Corrine, >>> > >>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on >>> java-apns... >>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like >>> mixing tokens). >>> > >>> > here is some code snippets: >>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code >>> > >>> > >>> > perhaps like: >>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych < >>> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> > Hello all >>> > >>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087 >>> > >>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with >>> Distribution certificate >>> > >>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations: >>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate >>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate >>> > >>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on the >>> PROD variant received the notification. >>> > >>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and >>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini >>> received the notification >>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid >>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not >>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work. >>> > >>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed callback >>> is called: >>> > >>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/... >>> > >>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a >>> UPS server locally to test further. >>> > >>> > ++ >>> > Corinne >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Hi Thomas, >>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of "x >>> installations" : >>> > > >>> > > <installation.png> >>> > > ​ >>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. >>> > > >>> > > Sebi >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the Admin >>> UI ;-) >>> > > >>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the >>> admin UI? >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >>> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >>> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Aerogear-users mailing list >>> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>> > >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>> > >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Aerogear-users mailing list >>> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Aerogear-users mailing list >>> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

Thanks for the update Matthias! On 18.11.2014, at 17:04, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: Hi thomas, here is an update on the actual issue: https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/124#issuecomment-63493965 I will file a PR for that On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > java version "1.7.0_71" > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14) > OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode) > > (I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I > didn’t configure anything specific). > > Cheers, > T > > > On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > Thomas, > > I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to > reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version > (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun > her tests. > > In the meantime, what is your version? > > Greetings, > Matthias > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output: >> >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: >> INVALID_TOKEN >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>> >> messageSendFailed[B@143f032d >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org >> > wrote: >> >>> what JDK version do you have ? >>> >>> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk >>> >>> I am unable to reproduce this behavior.... >>> >>> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS: >>> >>> >>> >>> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12", >>> "XXXX").withProductionDestination() >>> >>> >>> and I give it too tokens: >>> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) >>> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) >>> >>> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the >>> ordering of the tokens does not matter .. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt >>>> see: >>>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.var... >>>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed >>>> variant list” and line 68 content invalid dev certificate. >>>> >>>> the output is: >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: >>>> INVALID_TOKEN >>>> >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 >>>> >>>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, >>>> failure, retry etc.. >>>> >>>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the >>>> valid token. >>>> >>>> @matthias does it help? >>>> >>>> ++ >>>> Corinne >>>> >>>> >>>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>> > Hi Corrine, >>>> > >>>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on >>>> java-apns... >>>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like >>>> mixing tokens). >>>> > >>>> > here is some code snippets: >>>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > perhaps like: >>>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych < >>>> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> > Hello all >>>> > >>>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087 >>>> > >>>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with >>>> Distribution certificate >>>> > >>>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations: >>>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate >>>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate >>>> > >>>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on >>>> the PROD variant received the notification. >>>> > >>>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and >>>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini >>>> received the notification >>>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid >>>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not >>>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work. >>>> > >>>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed >>>> callback is called: >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/... >>>> > >>>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a >>>> UPS server locally to test further. >>>> > >>>> > ++ >>>> > Corinne >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Hi Thomas, >>>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of >>>> "x installations" : >>>> > > >>>> > > <installation.png> >>>> > > ​ >>>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. >>>> > > >>>> > > Sebi >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer < >>>> thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the >>>> Admin UI ;-) >>>> > > >>>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the >>>> admin UI? >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>>> > >>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>>> > >>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

Follow up question - could the “INVALID_TOKEN” problem also result from a production token from another app?

The reason I’m asking is that I deleted all the development tokens from the DB, but still couldnt receive a push message on a device. But I know that I’m sending push registrations to the production variant not just from the “Free” version of my app (using the correct “Free” variant ID and key), but also from the “Paid” version (incorrectly using the “Free" variant ID and key). Since I do not know the tokens sent from the “Paid” version, I cannot disable them.

Could this be the reason why I’m not receiving pushes? Since I’m using the OpenShift cartridge - what’s the best way how to proceed? Can I change the “withNoErrorDetection” of ApnsService somehow?

Thanks, Thomas On 18.11.2014, at 17:04, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: Hi thomas, here is an update on the actual issue: https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/issues/124#issuecomment-63493965 I will file a PR for that On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > java version "1.7.0_71" > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (rhel-2.5.3.1.el6-i386 u71-b14) > OpenJDK Server VM (build 24.65-b04, mixed mode) > > (I assume this is the default version installed by OpenShift, since I > didn’t configure anything specific). > > Cheers, > T > > > On 18.11.2014, at 14:57, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > > Thomas, > > I can not reproduce the issue (running Java 1.7.0_65). Corinne is able to > reproduce it, but she is currently running on an older Java version > (1.7.0_15). She is updating to a newer (the latest) of Java7 and will rerun > her tests. > > In the meantime, what is your version? > > Greetings, > Matthias > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Corinne shared her tokens, and using them, I get the same output: >> >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: >> INVALID_TOKEN >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>> >> messageSendFailed[B@143f032d >> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org >> > wrote: >> >>> what JDK version do you have ? >>> >>> I am running on jdk1.7.0_65.jdk >>> >>> I am unable to reproduce this behavior.... >>> >>> I have a connection to prod-stage from APS: >>> >>> >>> >>> .withCert("/Users/matzew/Desktop/PushCerts/prod.p12", >>> "XXXX").withProductionDestination() >>> >>> >>> and I give it too tokens: >>> iPodToken (production version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) >>> iPhoneToken (development version of the "net.wessendorf.prod" app-id) >>> >>> Since connecting to the PROD, only the iPod is delivered. Also the >>> ordering of the tokens does not matter .. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Corinne Krych <corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Adding a test as you suggested Matt >>>> see: >>>> https://github.com/corinnekrych/java-apns/blob/adding.test.with.mixed.var... >>>> Where line 67 content valid prod certificate for simulated “prod mixed >>>> variant list” and line 68 content invalid dev certificate. >>>> >>>> the output is: >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSent >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Closed: >>>> INVALID_TOKEN >>>> >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>messageSendFailed[B@143f032d >>>> :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>>>Retry: 0 >>>> >>>> I case of error for the variant line68 we go on all callback: success, >>>> failure, retry etc.. >>>> >>>> however when testing it with pan I do received the message for the >>>> valid token. >>>> >>>> @matthias does it help? >>>> >>>> ++ >>>> Corinne >>>> >>>> >>>> > On 17 Nov 2014, at 13:27, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Matthias Wessendorf < >>>> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >>>> > Hi Corrine, >>>> > >>>> > thanks for the detailed mail. To me this looks like a bug on >>>> java-apns... >>>> > Can you try that, with the standalone code (and your scenarios, like >>>> mixing tokens). >>>> > >>>> > here is some code snippets: >>>> > https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns#sample-code >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > perhaps like: >>>> > https://gist.github.com/matzew/35b47c74f8eb6a8353de >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I am currently on a train with a bad connection >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Corinne Krych < >>>> corinnekrych(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> > Hello all >>>> > >>>> > Indeed I can reproduce the problem as described in AGPUSH-1087 >>>> > >>>> > I have one variant: PROD with one installation on iPhone5S with >>>> Distribution certificate >>>> > >>>> > I have another variant: PRODMIX with 2 installations: >>>> > - on iPad mimi with distribution certificate >>>> > - on iPad2 with dev certificate >>>> > >>>> > When sending a notification to all variants, only the iPhone5S on >>>> the PROD variant received the notification. >>>> > >>>> > If I go to admin console and desactivate the iPad2 installation and >>>> sent again a Push message to all variants, now iPhone 5S and IPad mini >>>> received the notification >>>> > => Therefore, it is indeed when one installtion has non valid >>>> certificate thta all installations of this corrupted variants will not >>>> received the notification. I also confirm that the work around does work. >>>> > >>>> > Looking on FINE grained logging, I noticed that this succeed >>>> callback is called: >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/push/... >>>> > >>>> > The problem seem to be in deepsest level of code. I will install a >>>> UPS server locally to test further. >>>> > >>>> > ++ >>>> > Corinne >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Hi Thomas, >>>> > > You can browse your installations by clicking the blue number of >>>> "x installations" : >>>> > > >>>> > > <installation.png> >>>> > > ​ >>>> > > From there, you can toggle installations on on/off. >>>> > > >>>> > > Sebi >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Thomas Schweitzer < >>>> thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > another option is: toggle them as disabled on the UI of the >>>> Admin UI ;-) >>>> > > >>>> > > Hmm, where do I see the device tokens and can disable them in the >>>> admin UI? >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>>> > >>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>>> > >>>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Aerogear-users mailing list >>>> Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Aerogear-users mailing list > Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

On 09.12.2014, at 16:02, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Thomas Schweitzer <thomers(a)me.com&gt; wrote: > Follow up question - could the “INVALID_TOKEN” problem also result from a > production token from another app? > yes, that's the case too. It's an invalid token for the underlying certificate from apple. Ok, thought so. Thanks for the clarification. > The reason I’m asking is that I deleted all the development tokens from > the DB, but still couldnt receive a push message on a device. > > But I know that I’m sending push registrations to the production variant > not just from the “Free” version of my app (using the correct “Free” > variant ID and key), but also from the “Paid” version (incorrectly using > the “Free" variant ID and key). Since I do not know the tokens sent from > the “Paid” version, I cannot disable them. > I understand that you do not want to delete them. However, the 'didRegisterForRemoteNotificationsWithDeviceToken' method is always invoked when the application is launched - you will get back all your tokens, eventually ;-) It’s not that I do not want to delete them - I just don’t think I can determine which ones are the invalid ones (?), since the “Paid” version is live in the app store as well, and I do not know which devices are running it. (I do not care about sending pushes to the few “Paid” installations,

and I didn’t bother taking out the code to register the device token with the wrong variant/key, assuming it would not cause me any problems - duh ;-)).

Could this be the reason why I’m not receiving pushes? > > Since I’m using the OpenShift cartridge - what’s the best way how to > proceed? Can I change the “withNoErrorDetection” of ApnsService somehow? > Do you know what exact version of the UPS you are running on Openshift? I am asking, because you could build the UPS yourself and simply replace the WAR file. But we before we do that, let's make sure we are all on the same page I havent changed anything since I restarted the OpenShift application last month (see http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/2014-November/000020.html ) The OpenShift console shows AeroGear Push Server 1.0.0, MySQL 5.5, phpMyAdmin 4.0

_______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users

On 09.12.2014, at 16:22, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: The reason I’m asking is that I deleted all the development tokens from >> the DB, but still couldnt receive a push message on a device. >> >> But I know that I’m sending push registrations to the production variant >> not just from the “Free” version of my app (using the correct “Free” >> variant ID and key), but also from the “Paid” version (incorrectly using >> the “Free" variant ID and key). Since I do not know the tokens sent from >> the “Paid” version, I cannot disable them. >> > > I understand that you do not want to delete them. However, the > 'didRegisterForRemoteNotificationsWithDeviceToken' method is always invoked > when the application is launched - you will get back all your tokens, > eventually ;-) > > > It’s not that I do not want to delete them - I just don’t think I can > determine which ones are the invalid ones (?), since the “Paid” version is > live in the app store as well, and I do not know which devices are running > it. (I do not care about sending pushes to the few “Paid” installations, > Ok, let's see what we can do here. paid and free (both are backed by PRODUCTION Apple certs) are on the same variant? is the free one on the app-store too? Do you care about the 'free', or do you only care about the 'paid' version ? i only created a PRODUCTION variant for the FREE version, because that is the only one i care about (since the number of PAID downloads is much lower, and i dont need to send them pushes). so, the setup is: *) the FREE app installs register correctly against the FREE PRODUCTION variant *) the PAID app installs register incorrectly against the FREE PRODUCTION variant i want to send pushes to the FREE devices. > and I didn’t bother taking out the code to register the device token with > the wrong variant/key, assuming it would not cause me any problems - duh > ;-)). > but it is :-) The real "problem" with the registration against the 'wrong' variant is, that well, they are different app-ids and apple certs i know. i was totally aware of that - just thought (naively) that the wrong registrations will by silently discarded/ignored…

Could this be the reason why I’m not receiving pushes? >> >> Since I’m using the OpenShift cartridge - what’s the best way how to >> proceed? Can I change the “withNoErrorDetection” of ApnsService somehow? >> > > > Do you know what exact version of the UPS you are running on Openshift? I > am asking, because you could build the UPS yourself and simply replace the > WAR file. > But we before we do that, let's make sure we are all on the same page > > > I havent changed anything since I restarted the OpenShift application > last month (see > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/2014-November/000020.html > ) > > The OpenShift console shows > > AeroGear Push Server 1.0.0, MySQL 5.5, phpMyAdmin 4.0 > Ok, thanks > > any idea what i could do now?

if the only possible solution is to build the WAR from scratch and install it ontop of the openshift cartridge, i’d do that, but maybe there is an easier way?

thanks thomas _______________________________________________ Aerogear-users mailing list Aerogear-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users