On 23 May 2011, at 22:41, Arne Limburg <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de> wrote:
Maybe we should explicitly state that AnnotatedType contains
superclass information. Currently it's implicit because of my wording and the fact,
that Annotations on superclasses are processed (i.e. @Inject on superclasses works).
Regards,
Arne
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Peter Muir [mailto:pmuir@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 23. Mai 2011 23:28
An: Arne Limburg
Cc: Mark Struberg; cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Betreff: Re: [cdi-dev] Should AnnotatedType also reflect inherited information?
Yes, AnnotatedType is the *only* source of metadata, reflection must not be used.
Arne's wording is in HEAD.
--
Pete Muir
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
On 23 May 2011, at 22:25, Arne Limburg <arne.limburg(a)openknowledge.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My suggestions on this will make it clear for CDI 1.1:
>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-70
> With this clarifications the current implementation in OWB would be illegal since it
introspects the superclass using reflection instead of using the AnnotatedType (which
currently would not work, since the AnnotatedType does not contain this information).
>
> The problem here is, that if the AnnotatedType does not contain information of
superclass hierarchy (like currently in OWB), there is no way for Extensions to modify
annotations of superclasses (i.e. add a qualifier to an @Inject-field or -method). Nothing
seems to indicate that this was the intention of the CDI 1.0 spec ;-)
>
> Kind regards,
> Arne
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] Im
Auftrag von Mark Struberg
> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Mai 2011 23:13
> An: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Betreff: [cdi-dev] Should AnnotatedType also reflect inherited information?
>
> Hi!
>
> I think the spec is not explicit on this question: Should the AnnotatedType delivered
to the Extensions as parameter or via BeanManager#getAnnostatedType() also deliver
information gathered from it's superclass hierarchy?
>
> Sounds reasonable, but is nowhere explicitely defined. Thus I better ask ;)
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev