Either way is fine with me. In general 16:00 UTC is a good choice since it seems not to be mid-might for anyone that is involved. Best regards, Mark Am 30.08.2014 um 12:53 schrieb Thorben Janssen <thjanssen123(a)gmail.com&gt;: Wednesday at the same time is fine for me. Do you want to shift all meetings or only this one? Regards, Thorben ------------------------------ Von: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Gesendet: ‎30.‎08.‎2014 12:18 An: John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com&gt; Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Betreff: Re: [cdi-dev] Spec launch meeting and CDI weekly meeting Hi John, Sorry to have missed that. According to Pete, French are holidays specialists. I guess I have to improve my expertise in this domain ;). Is it ok for everybody to switch the meeting on Wednesday at the same time ? If there ware no objection I will send you an invitation Monday. Antoine Le 29 août 2014 à 18:53, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com&gt; a écrit : Could it be pushed to later in the week? Monday's a holiday in the US. On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand < antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; wrote: > Hi All, > > On CDI 1.1, we use to have a weekly meeting each monday at 16:00 UTC > (that’s 9:00 am PDT, 6:00 pm CEST and 9:30 pm IST). It’s hard to find a > time slot that please everybody (from US West Coast to India), so Ir > propose we keep this track. Now, if you have issue with this slot (if you > live in New Zealand or Australia) say it and we’ll try to figure out a > better slot (even if there’s no ideal one). > > The meeting place is the IRC channel and last one hour. We use an IRC bot > (jbott) to keep track of meeting minutes for the record or people unable to > attend the meeting. You can get familiarised with BOT commands here : > https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot > > So I propose we have our JSR launch meeting next monday (sept 1st) with > the following agenda : > > - Discussion on the working method and tools used (mainly do we use > Google Drive or Github with Asciidoc for working doc) > - Discussion on each workshop I mentioned in my previous post and missing > workshop > * Workshop teams > * Workflow chosen > * estimated deadline (hard to say since we don’t know our workforce, but > will be refined later) > - Q & A if we still have time > > Note that It think we should avoid talking about specific content of > workshop except if you think things are missing or that we could forgot > them. > If you want to see other points in the agenda let me know. > > I’m thrilled to start this great project with you guys. > > Antoine > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the > code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other > intellectual property rights inherent in such information. > _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.