yes. the approach I am currently taking is
a) make it work
b) provide an SPI/API a top it
a) is what I am working on at the moment. it's the process of adding the bpm console
requirements to the current workspace codebase. During this phase I don't spend much
time thinking
about proper API.
once everything works as it used to be, I would go ahead and clean it up, which results in
an API.
I hope this approach makes sense to you.
/Heiko
On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:48 PM, Lillian Angel wrote:
On 2010-01-26, at 4:28 PM, Mike Brock wrote:
> What we really need to do, I think, is create a proper front-end SPI that uses the
MessageBus in the implementation to do all the communication with the Workspace layout
system. That was kind of what I was trying to do before. This will make it a lot easier
to maintain, and also support the federability aspects we talked about earlier.
+1
I like this idea. I think it would be extremely to maintain and change when needed.
Lillian
_______________________________________________
errai-dev mailing list
errai-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev