Right what I should have added is that on the server side the interceptors are cdi
interceptors and I cannot just change the way cdi will look for annotations. The other way
around only have them on the implementation also doesn't work because the client side
code will not be able to access the implementation. So possible solution would be to
recreate the cdi interceptor concept our self.
On May 23, 2013, at 3:40 PM, "Lincoln Baxter, III"
<lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah yes, the good old "why are my annotated interface method
annotations not inherIted?" question. This all depends on how you are scanning for
the annotation. Typically annotation scanning only looks at the base level class, but you
generally have to walk up the type hierarchy to find the real answer :) like so:
https://github.com/forge/core/blob/2.0/container-api/src/main/java/org/jb...
Hope this helps,
~Lincoln
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Erik Jan de Wit <edewit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
Good news I think I'm done with the security module, finally. But there is one last
thing that is bothering me. Maybe someone has a solution I didn't think of.
Like I've explained before I have a 2 SecurityInterceptors one on the client and one
on the server. With the client security interceptor I check the servers state and
'redirect' the user to the login page if he is not logged in. Because the client
can be manipulated there is also a server side interceptor that will throw a exception if
the user is not logged in.
This is all very nice and all a user will have to do is annotate the methods. I use the
same annotation for both the client and the server side interceptor, but I have to
annotate the remote interface and the service implementation e.g.
@Remote
public interface MessageService {
@RequireAuthentication
String hello();
@RequireRoles("admin")
String ping();
}
@Service
public class MessageServiceImpl implements MessageService {
@Inject
AuthenticationService authenticationService;
@Override
@RequireAuthentication
public String hello() {
What I don't like is that the user will need to keep these to in sync, do you guys
have an idea to have only one of these but still have both of the interceptors triggered?
Cheers,
Erik Jan
_______________________________________________
errai-dev mailing list
errai-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
_______________________________________________
errai-dev mailing list
errai-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev