11:17 p.m.
I think it was possible to do that in Forge 1?
BTW, how do you get a project name from the Project object? Is it through
the Maven facet? Do we always have that on a project?
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:06 AM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>wrote:
I'd rather pass as a param than injecting tbh. This allows the
object to
be reused as a singleton without aby thread issues.
Btw Project is not yet available for injection. Should we create a JIRA
for it?
Em 25/01/2014, às 20:02, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
OK, but what does the JavaEEDefaultProvider::configure method do? It
produces the content of persistence.xml. Why would you need Project object
to pollute the interface if it's used in just one of the implementations?
And we can even do without it, as you noted.
When I asked this question in the first message of this thread, I was
thinking of somehow injecting the project, not changing the interface.
But if you say it's reasonable, I will do that, it's not a big deal.
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:00 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>wrote:
> However since we are on CR1, and other requirements may appear, perhaps
> it's wise to change the interface definition now than later. :)
>
> Em 25/01/2014, às 18:58, "Ivan St. Ivanov"
<ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> Thanks, George!
>
> As I am not really keen to change the interface definition, I would do it
> as you proposed: without the project name.
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey Ivan,
>> You could change the configure method signature to pass the project as a
>> parameter, but remember that it may be null.
>>
>> However, I think it would be better to not add the projectName to the
>> DDL file in order to keep it simple and easier to find.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> George Gastaldi
>>
>> Em 25/01/2014, às 18:42, "Ivan St. Ivanov"
<ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I am working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1443. It's not a
>> big deal, it's a matter of adding a few lines to the JavaEEDefaultProvider
>> class.
>>
>> One of the requirements is that the create and drop scripts should bear
>> the name of the project: <projectName>Creade.ddl and
<projectName>Drop.ddl.
>> I wonder is there a way to pass that somehow to the persistence provider?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ivan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev