(Being able
to add @Named to an EJBs... or any annotation anywhere)
I've linked it to
(Being able to
generate methods) because at the end of the day, the idea behind both JIRAs
is being able to add Java artifacts (attributes, annotations, methods...)
to any kind of component (entity, backing bean, rest endpoint...)
2014-06-13 16:00 GMT+02:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>:
+1, is there a JIRA already for this?
Em 13/06/2014, às 10:51, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
Hi folks!
I think that java-add-annotation is a good command that we should have.
But still it would be better to have also something more explicit for
creating named beans and setting stereotypes. So, I think that the three
levels of abstraction that Antonio described may be implemented. Well, at
the end they will reuse one and the same code for adding annotation, so no
repeating ourselves will occur.
Cheers,
Ivan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:39 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I am leaning towards the java-add-annotation approach as it seems more
> intuitive and could solve other use cases that may arise.
>
> Em 13/06/2014, às 04:19, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing(a)gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> When I create an EJB with Forge with the following command :
>
> ejb-new-bean --named MyService
>
> I get the following :
>
> @Stateless
> @LocalBean
> public class MyService implements Serializable
>
> In some cases, I would need to add an extra @Named annotation. Several
> ways to do it. On the EJB command itself, we could add a parameter :
>
> ejb-new-bean --named MyService --addNamed
>
> But I think it would be good to have something more generic that could be
> used anywhere. We could use the same logic as constraint-add (that adds
> any kind of constraint on any Entity) and have something like
>
> cdi-add-qualifier --qualifier Named --target org.app.service.MyService
> // or on a property, which could be useful
> cdi-add-qualifier --qualifier Named --onProperty myProp
> cdi-add-qualifier --qualifier Named --onMethod myMethod
>
> Or something even more generic would be to use the Java command
>
> java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --target
> org.app.service.MyService
> java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --target
> org.app.service.MyService --onProperty myProp
> java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --target
> org.app.service.MyService --onMethod myMethod
> java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --onProperty myProp
> java-add-annotation --annotation javax.inject.Named --onMethod myMethod
>
> Any thoughts ?
>
> Antonio
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev