From: "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; To: "forge-dev List" <forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:03:35 AM Subject: [forge-dev] Build broken due to FORGE-1823 and FORGE-1824 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1823 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1824 Fixing these issue has revealed numerous places within our codebase that we were incorrectly depending on IMPL classes that should not have been leaked on the maven classpath. Now that the leak has been fixed, we have to clean up the mess :) The only compilations I know to be remaining are in the scaffold-faces project.

It remains to be seen how many of the tests break due to this change... we'll see. -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.org "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

Unfortunately that would be incorrect. The whole point of this is that we are moving toward a real api/impl split where API classes are visible to dependent classloaders, and impl classes are not. On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Vineet Reynolds Pereira < vpereira(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt; > > To: "forge-dev List" <forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 5:03:35 AM > > Subject: [forge-dev] Build broken due to FORGE-1823 and FORGE-1824 > > > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1823 > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1824 > > > > Fixing these issue has revealed numerous places within our codebase > that we > > were incorrectly depending on IMPL classes that should not have been > leaked > > on the maven classpath. > > > > Now that the leak has been fixed, we have to clean up the mess :) The > only > > compilations I know to be remaining are in the scaffold-faces project. > > Would it be correct to fix the compilation errors in the scaffold-faces > project, > by adding javaee-impl as a provided dependency to this project? > > Some javaee-impl and transitive dependencies are required during > compilation of > scaffold-faces, while at runtime, this would be provided by the javaee > addon. > > > > > It remains to be seen how many of the tests break due to this change... > we'll > > see. > > > > -- > > Lincoln Baxter, III > > http://ocpsoft.org > > "Simpler is better." > > > > _______________________________________________ > > forge-dev mailing list > > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.org "Simpler is better."