Re: [forge-dev] Forge License

+1 from me too. After having a short review of the differences EPL seems to be the most suitable. IMHO any proprietary plugin built on Forge automatically fosters the quality of the core - the best plugin will be useless on an instable foundation. APL seems to be too permissive as this backlash is not enforced, allowing kind of "we have the stable Forge" parallel development. GPL V2 may be ok too but incompatible with EPL/APL, V3 seems to be too political. If technical excellency is the primary goal, then I would go for EPL. Thomas Sent from my good old Linux 3.1.10-1.9 desktop down in the cellars where I am allowed to do the real stuff ;-) Am 26.05.2012 23:47, schrieb Dan Allen: > +1 Nice additions. I think the EPL really captures the spirit of the > permissive licensing for addons and copyleft for the core that should > allow each party to have the "freedom" (quoted due to the dual > meaning) they want. > > -Dan > _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev