----- "Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> *
jboss.org/forge -> this can be easily got. However we
cannot
have
>> all the services that we need (like hosting our plugin repository
for
>> example). We should stick to the ones offered by the
jboss.org
server
>
> -1 if we have limitations
What does hosting plugin repo require ?
I thought the repo was just a static file that would be regenerated
from time to time ?
From conversations with Lincoln, the repository would be more dynamic
(e.g. web app) than static. I'll let Lincoln list the details. The other item we
discussed was the URL's themselves as
forge.jboss.org/plugins would be preferred over
jboss.org/forge/plugins
but that specifically is an aesthetic issue more than a technical one
Would a reverse proxy setup be sufficient ?
i.e.
jboss.org/forge/repo redirected to some openshift hosted setup ?
I don't think
jboss.org guys would reject that upfront if they get
asked.
Depends of course of what IT etc. says and how the setup works - i.e.
I got such setup for jboss central feeds to feedburner and the only
challenge
been that they only allow proxy redirect to specific set of IP's but
that shouldn't
be a a big problem for this should it ?
>> *
forge.jboss.org -> we can use this domain name in all kinds of
cloud
>> solutions (like Openshift). There we will be in power to choose
the
>> web site technology
>
> +1
I got
tools.jboss.org setup, but that just goes to
jboss.org/tools and
just because
this was asked for long before they started using:
issues.jboss.org,
community.jboss.org,
source.jboss.org etc.
forge.jboss.org falls a bit outside of this so not sure how that fits,
but worth asking
jboss.org guys about.
/max
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev