Re: [forge-dev] rest refactoring

Hi! Had a good time? The new API looks really good to use here, didn't know we could do that… I wasn't too happy with using configuration for this, because it will break on refactoring, so it's much better is we can do it this way. I will look into it to use it. Paul On Feb 27, 2012, at 17:09 , Lincoln Baxter, III wrote: Hey Paul! Back from Vaca. My first thought here is that this is excellent use of the Configuration API, but I think currently the way this is written, it depends on the Configuration in order to recognize the fact that there is an application class serving as a REST activator? We could use the JavaParser TreeVisiting API that was just introduced, in order to search project sources and make this determination. https://github.com/forge/core/blob/master/shell-api/src/main/java/org/jbo... Thoughts? ~Lincoln On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Paul Bakker <paul.bakker(a)luminis.eu&gt;wrote: > Hi Lincoln, > > I made some progress on refactoring the rest stuff, plus I added the > option to use an Application class instead of web.xml. Because it changed > quite a lot and this is the first time we use the idea of having "nested" > facets it would probably be good if you review before I merge to master. > > > https://github.com/forge/core/commit/ec0275a821c6bb3ccf690b55d66816073ba0... > > Let me know what you think :-) > > Paul > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.com http://scrumshark.com "Keep it Simple" _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev