Yeah, I like simple.
I'm even suggesting we don't use the classpath for this. Just use a plain
folder somewhere.
Thoughts?
Lincoln
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Richard Kennard <
richard(a)kennardconsulting.com> wrote:
Agree 100%. If Lincoln can set up the 'override folder'
mechanism, I'll
refactor the existing scaffolding resources to be much 'flatter'.
Twill be sweet!
Richard.
On 4/01/2012 4:26 PM, Dan Allen wrote:
> I like the idea of a drop-in file set.
>
> I suggest reconsidering the heavily nested structure. One thing that
people really love about RoR, Grails and so forth is that they don't
overcomplicate
> things. A prime example is folders. In Java we are obsessed with this
idea of prefixing everything with a domain name so that common names will
ever have
> a remote chance of conflicting. But are their really going to be like a
hundred tools named forge? or even two?
>
> Having said all that, here's my suggestion:
>
> src/main/resources/forge/scaffolding
>
> or, to be less technology specific w/ regards to the scaffolding
>
> src/main/resources/scaffolding
>
> As Lincoln likes to say, keep it simple. Lincoln, is this inline with
your motto?
>
> -Dan
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 14:40, Richard Kennard <
richard(a)kennardconsulting.com <mailto:richard@kennardconsulting.com>>
wrote:
>
> Lincoln,
>
> I don't think this should be an API. It needs to be something users
can 'drop in' without needing to compile any code.
>
> I'm fine with a single folder called '/resources'. I chose that
name
to mirror Maven /src/main/resources, since the subfolder structure from
then on
> should
> be the same. This'd help people who are digging around in the plugin
code to determine what resource names they needed to override.
>
> '/resources' then gets added to Forge's classpath as the first
thing
on the list. So when I do...
>
>
.getResource("org/jboss/forge/scaffold/faces/scaffold/create.xhtml"); or
>
compiler.compile("org/jboss/forge/scaffold/faces/scaffold/create.xhtml")
>
> ...I will always pick up the override first if there is one at
/resources/org/jboss/forge/scaffold/faces/scaffold/create.xhtml.
>
> Seeing as how users may want to drop in a new metawidget.xml, we'd
need some ability to add arbitrary JARs too. Either under /resources or
/lib or
> somewhere else. They then can easily drop in a new bit of code, and
configure Metawidget to use it.
>
> But Max may have a more experienced position :)
>
> Richard.
>
> On 4/01/2012 5:34 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> > This sounds like something that would be really good for users. I
guess I just need to know what specifically you think this should look
like, then we
> > can define an API or even just a config setting (using the new
configuration API) might be enough. Is this just a single directory?
Multiple? What does
> > the layout look like? Do we want a configured path for each image,
stylesheet, and file, or will we look up children by a specific file-name?
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > ~Lincoln
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Richard Kennard <
richard(a)kennardconsulting.com <mailto:richard@kennardconsulting.com>
> <mailto:richard@kennardconsulting.com <mailto:
richard(a)kennardconsulting.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > I think this sounds like a great idea. It should probably be
'Forge-wide' rather than specific to the scaffolding, as I imagine other
plugins might
> > have a
> > similar requirement. Lincoln can you define something?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> > On 23/12/2011 11:26 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> > > In Hibernate Tools I had a notion of a template path (classpath
is not appropriate for this IMO).
> > >
> > >
http://docs.jboss.org/tools/3.3.0.M5/en/hibernatetools/html_single/index....
> > >
> > > Templatepath was a list of directories and we used the the
classpath as the last fallback, meaning it would pickup the tools provided
ones.
> > >
> > > I also went the "extra step" and placed these templates in
"packages" a.k.a. sub directory to allow the different
> > > template usages to be configured via just one template path.
> > >
> > > i.e. we had a view, pojo, hbm and a few others to separate them
properly and to avoid name collisions.
> > >
> > > /max
> > >
> > > On Dec 23, 2011, at 06:20, Richard Kennard wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi guys,
> > >>
> > >> I've written up a bit of documentation for the scaffolding
here:
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/FORGE/UI+Scaffolding
> > >>
> > >> But I have a question around the customization. Clearly, we
have some nice template files like 'create.xhtml' and 'BackingBean.jv'
which can be
> > edited in
> > >> any text editor. And we have a nice separation of the CSS/image
files that can be replaced to change the look and feel.
> > >>
> > >> But how are we expecting people to 'get at' these files?
Are
they supposed to extend the existing scaffold plugin? Or open up the JAR
and edit
> > these files?
> > >> Or can they be placed 'on the classpath' somehow such that
they
will be found before the ones in the scaffolding JAR? Or some other way?
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Richard.
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> forge-dev mailing list
> > >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> > >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> > > /max
> > >
http://about.me/maxandersen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > forge-dev mailing list
> > > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
<mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lincoln Baxter, III
> >
http://ocpsoft.com
> >
http://scrumshark.com
> > "Keep it Simple"
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > forge-dev mailing list
> > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Allen
> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
>
>
http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>
http://mojavelinux.com
>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev