Re: [forge-dev] Obtaining project name in persistence provider

Em 25/01/2014, às 18:58, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com&gt; escreveu: Thanks, George! As I am not really keen to change the interface definition, I would do it as you proposed: without the project name. Cheers, Ivan > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hey Ivan, > You could change the configure method signature to pass the project as a parameter, but remember that it may be null. > > However, I think it would be better to not add the projectName to the DDL file in order to keep it simple and easier to find. > > Best Regards, > > George Gastaldi > >> Em 25/01/2014, às 18:42, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com&gt; escreveu: >> > >> Hi folks, >> >> I am working on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1443. It's not a big deal, it's a matter of adding a few lines to the JavaEEDefaultProvider class. >> >> One of the requirements is that the create and drop scripts should bear the name of the project: <projectName>Creade.ddl and <projectName>Drop.ddl. I wonder is there a way to pass that somehow to the persistence provider? >> >> Thanks, >> Ivan >> _______________________________________________ >> forge-dev mailing list >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev