Re: [forge-dev] Forge License

For clarification, Forge is currently LGPL :) On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:29 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > Absolutely ! Feel free to add anything related to it on the issue. > > Regards, > > George Gastaldi > > 2012/5/24 Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com&gt;: > > I think those interested would want to know pros / cons in laymen's > terms. Could we have that in the JIRA? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On May 24, 2012, at 13:23, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > > >> Hello all, > >> > >> > >> Dan Allen, Lincoln and I were discussing about moving Forge license to > >> EPL (Eclipse) instead of the current Apache one. > >> What are your thoughts about it? Glad if you could post your comments > >> on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-580 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> George Gastaldi > >> _______________________________________________ > >> forge-dev mailing list > >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > forge-dev mailing list > > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.org "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev