2:41 p.m.
Pete I think that Thomas is talking about the marshalling protocol used by
Errai, you can use its own or one that is "jackson compatible".
I prefere the latter because I use JAX-RS services that produces JSON with
Jackson.
Ciao.
2012/12/19 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Jackson is a marshalling library for XML and JSON. Errai is a
framework
for building apps that execute in the browser. I'm not sure you can replace
one with the other.
On 19 Dec 2012, at 13:55, A-ON Puls Referenz-User wrote:
> Sorry I was not up to the point, I am talking of current implementation
of Aerogear scaffold of Forge.
>
> The question is: should Aerogear scaffold continue with Jackson or
migrate to Errai?
>
> Thomas
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
> Von: "Luca Masini"
> Erhalten: 19.12.2012 13:03
> An: "forge-dev List"
>
> Hi Thomas, I didn't understand very well the question in your poll.
>
> Anyway when you talk about the marshalling, do you mean an annotation
that know how to manage how to serialize persistent collection ??
>
> In a way, are you talking about the problem that frameworks like Gilead
try to solve ??
>
>
> 2012/12/18 Thomas Frühbeck < fruehbeck(a)aon.at >
> Hi,
>
> during experiments extending a generated aerogear application I found
that
> - the current integration of JSON via Jackson is kinda creative hack
> - not easily portable to recent releases of Jackson (see above)
> - does not make use of annotation driven UI/ser/deserializ. processing
>
> During my investigations on upgrade possibilities to modern Jackson I
realized, that Errai is a very powerful and complete framework well worth
being featured
> in Forge's scaffold.
> As I am not really deep into Jackson/JSON/Rest yet I would like to ask
for your opinion on this.
>
> Another question regarding use of annotations in a scaffold:
> Especially regarding modern Errai/Jackson annotations are an easy means
to control the UI / (De-)Serialization, e.g. when working with entities, I
think it is
> necessary to use persistence-based entity instantiation before
deserialization, to avoid loss of data if an incomplete entity is
desrialized and persisted by
> merge().
>
> Do you think it acceptable to actively insert annotations into entity
code - possibly by a scaffold command like "scaffold applyAnnotations"?
>
> In my opinion this could provide interesting best practice propagation
for novices like me.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
>
> --
> ****************************************
> http://www.lucamasini.net
> http://twitter.com/lmasini
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9
> ****************************************
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
****************************************
http://www.lucamasini.net
http://twitter.com/lmasini
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9
****************************************