Re: [forge-dev] [Need Help to do some updates on my forge folder to get scaffold customized]

Yes, however make sure you are using the github repository to get the code, not just unzipping the JARs :) http://github.com/forge/core On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:28 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com&gt;wrote: > Always use the latest version , 1.1.3-Final in the case :) > > Em 03/01/2013, às 21:30, Richard Kennard <richard(a)kennardconsulting.com&gt; > escreveu: > > > Ahmed, > > > > Sounds great! Note there is an existing RichFacesWidgetBuilder in > Forge. The intent would be you create a new PrimeFacesWidgetBuilder for > purely PrimeFaces > > components, and combine that with RichFacesWidgetBuilder and > HtmlWidgetBuilder (and probably ReadOnlyWidgetBuilder) by using > CompositeWidgetBuilder. > > > > You should *not* need to create your own WidgetBuilder that creates > both PrimeFaces *and* RichFaces components. > > > > Re: the version of the sources, that's one for Lincoln :) > > > > Regards, > > > > Richard. > > > > On 3/01/2013 9:51 PM, Ahmed ELJABIRI wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Thank you Lincoln & Richard for your answers and for your help. > >> > >> I'm actually creating a custom WidgetBuilder based on Primefaces > components as with RicheFaces one. > >> > >> Once finish the module, I will integrate the jar in the > metawidget-all-2.4, and then I'll edit the file metawidget-entity.xml, and > also the two classes > >> FacesScaffold and > >> > >> EntityWidgetBuilder to adapt them to the changes. > >> > >> But an other question concerning forge sources, should i use those of > forge-1.1.3.Final(https://github.com/forge/core/tree/1.1.3.Final) or > those > >> > >> of 1.1.2.Final that we use actually ? > >> > >> Thank you so much in advence. > >> > >> > >> > >> 2013/1/2 Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com <mailto: > lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com&gt;&gt; > >> > >> Well... it probably won't happen until we get Forge 2 out the door, > sadly, unless someone out there has some time to contribute to make it > happen. > >> Forge 2 will make this much easier to do and hopefully we will > re-design the whole scaffold architecture so that resources can be made > available to > >> metawidget from other addons more easily (actually this is already > working as seen in the resource addon.) > >> > >> > https://github.com/forge/core/blob/2.0/resource/api/src/main/java/org/jbo... > >> > >> If we just want to be able to add template resources from disk, > then that would be fine as well, but I'd want to know what folks think is a > >> reasonably friendly way of doing this for end users. I really don't > know what would be good/acceptable. > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Richard Kennard < > richard(a)kennardconsulting.com <mailto:richard@kennardconsulting.com>> > wrote: > >> > >> Ahmed, > >> > >> Yes - much of what you want to accomplish can be done by > writing a custom WidgetBuilder (see > >> > http://metawidget.org/doc/reference/en/html/ch02s04.html#section-architec...) > and then modifying > >> metawidget-entity.xml to hook it in. You may also modify the > /resources/scaffold/faces templates (create.xhtml, search.xhtml etc). > >> > >> The hard part is how to actually *get at* these files to modify > them. This has been an outstanding issue for some time. Lincoln can we make > a New > >> Years resolution to get some movement on this? > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGEPLUGINS-68 > >> > >> For now you probably need to repackage your own plugin. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Richard. > >> > >> > >> On 3/01/2013 8:05 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote: > >> > >> Hello Ahmed, > >> > >> Welcome to the list. > >> > >> At first glance, it seems that you should be able to do > this relatively simply by modifying the metawidget XML configuration, and > perhaps > >> providing your own generation class, but I will need to > defer you to Richard Kennard, the author of Metawidget, since he will know > the answer > >> (and hopefully be able to tell you how to proceed without > too much trouble on his part.) > >> > >> I am not too knowledgeable about this part of Forge. I've > also copied a few people who might be able to give advice with their > experience > >> writing custom scaffolds. > >> > >> ~Lincoln > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Ahmed ELJABIRI < > a.eljabiri(a)gmail.com <mailto:a.eljabiri@gmail.com> <mailto: > a.eljabiri(a)gmail.com > >> <mailto:a.eljabiri@gmail.com>>> wrote: > >> > >> Ahmed > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Lincoln Baxter, III > >> http://ocpsoft.org > >> "Simpler is better." > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Lincoln Baxter, III > >> http://ocpsoft.org > >> "Simpler is better." > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> forge-dev mailing list > >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:forge-dev@lists.jboss.org> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> --------------------- > >> > >> Ahmed EL JABIRI > >> Senior JEE Developer at Ardass Conseil > >> e-mail : ahmed.eljabiri(a)ardassconseil.com <mailto: > ahmed.eljabiri(a)ardassconseil.com&gt; > >> Phone : +212 668 204 835 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> forge-dev mailing list > >> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > forge-dev mailing list > > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > > _______________________________________________ > forge-dev mailing list > forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev > -- Lincoln Baxter, III http://ocpsoft.org "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ forge-dev mailing list forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev