Thanks, George!
As I am not really keen to change the interface definition, I would do it
as you proposed: without the project name.
Cheers,
Ivan
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:52 PM, George Gastaldi <ggastald(a)redhat.com>wrote:
Hey Ivan,
You could change the configure method signature to pass the project as a
parameter, but remember that it may be null.
However, I think it would be better to not add the projectName to the DDL
file in order to keep it simple and easier to find.
Best Regards,
George Gastaldi
Em 25/01/2014, às 18:42, "Ivan St. Ivanov" <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
Hi folks,
I am working on
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-1443. It's not a
big deal, it's a matter of adding a few lines to the JavaEEDefaultProvider
class.
One of the requirements is that the create and drop scripts should bear
the name of the project: <projectName>Creade.ddl and <projectName>Drop.ddl.
I wonder is there a way to pass that somehow to the persistence provider?
Thanks,
Ivan
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev