The UUID is the test case because it was not given a name. That's fine and
not a problem.
What I was pointing out was the duplicate resources addon, with two
different snapshot versions, one with a date timestamp, and one without.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:08 PM, <ggastald(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I think Forge 2 should never use a UUID approach for the addons, but
the
version as part of the folder name.
On 03/12/2013 07:30 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
I think this is another issue. Looks like duplicate addons being
installed? This (I think) is causing container hangs *uergh*
lb3@quadshark:~/Projects/jboss/forge/core$ ls
/tmp/forge4361231800560189609test-addon-dir -la
total 4
drwxrwxr-x 6 lb3 lb3 140 Mar 12 18:28 .
drwxrwxrwt 73 root root 1800 Mar 12 18:28 ..
drwxrwxr-x 2 lb3 lb3 140 Mar 12 18:28
-DEFAULT-4588358c-a401-42fa-9b46-93f0295f10c4
-rw-rw-r-- 1 lb3 lb3 355 Mar 12 18:28 installed.xml
drwxrwxr-x 3 lb3 lb3 140 Mar 12 18:28
org-jboss-forge-facets-2-0-0-20130312-201651-45
drwxrwxr-x 3 lb3 lb3 140 Mar 12 18:28
org-jboss-forge-resources-2-0-0-20130308-141036-39
drwxrwxr-x 2 lb3 lb3 40 Mar 12 18:28
org-jboss-forge-resources-2-0-0-SNAPSHOT
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing
listforge-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
*George Gastaldi* | *Senior Software Engineer*
JBoss Forge Team
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."