9:13 a.m.
Hi folks,
Look what I found today:
http://planet.jboss.org/post/jboss_maven_java_ee_6_specification_apis
Is there a change with respect to the current situation with the maven
dependencies? Should we do anything in Forge?
Cheers,
Ivan
10:16 a.m.
Nope, that's what we are already using. We could upgrade to 3.0.0.Final, or
better yet give the user the choice.
Note that there is still a bug in the specs that require an exclusion to
use with Arquillian (works fine for compilation).
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jboss.spec</groupId>
<artifactId>jboss-javaee-6.0</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0.Final</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>provided</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.apache.xalan</groupId>
<artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
This isn't a problem if you are just using the spec bom to import
dependency versions (scope = import).
-Dan
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Hi folks,
Look what I found today:
http://planet.jboss.org/post/jboss_maven_java_ee_6_specification_apis
Is there a change with respect to the current situation with the maven
dependencies? Should we do anything in Forge?
Cheers,
Ivan
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
10:17 a.m.
Btw, that blog entry is part of the effort in the JBoss Community to
provide clearer information for application developers about how to make
use of the JBoss technologies in the field.
-Dan
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Hi folks,
Look what I found today:
http://planet.jboss.org/post/jboss_maven_java_ee_6_specification_apis
Is there a change with respect to the current situation with the maven
dependencies? Should we do anything in Forge?
Cheers,
Ivan
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
12:03 a.m.
Users can choose BOM version as of 1.0.5.Final :)
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Btw, that blog entry is part of the effort in the JBoss Community to
provide clearer information for application developers about how to make
use of the JBoss technologies in the field.
-Dan
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Look what I found today:
>
> http://planet.jboss.org/post/jboss_maven_java_ee_6_specification_apis
>
> Is there a change with respect to the current situation with the maven
> dependencies? Should we do anything in Forge?
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
_______________________________________________
forge-dev mailing list
forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
2:30 a.m.
Most excellent.
-Dan
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Users can choose BOM version as of 1.0.5.Final :)
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Btw, that blog entry is part of the effort in the JBoss Community to
>> provide clearer information for application developers about how to make
>> use of the JBoss technologies in the field.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <ivan.st.ivanov(a)gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Look what I found today:
>>>
>>> http://planet.jboss.org/post/jboss_maven_java_ee_6_specification_apis
>>>
>>> Is there a change with respect to the current situation with the maven
>>> dependencies? Should we do anything in Forge?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>
>> http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>> http://mojavelinux.com
>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
4346
days inactive
4347
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dan Allen -
Ivan St. Ivanov -
Lincoln Baxter, III