On 17.11.2015 17:07, John Sanda wrote:
I’m fine with this as well. It is a step in the right direction;
however, I think ultimately we should be using the same physical session object since we
are communicating with the same physical cluster. To achieve this, I think a resource
adapter is likely the best solution, but I don’t yet have any experience with writing
resource adapters.
While I also have no experience with that, I think I might have some
free cycles for the next MS for it, so, I could handle that together
with the kettle+accounts dist that was discussed on IRC some time ago.
- Juca.