Re: [Hawkular-dev] Public Hawkular Instances - Feedback Please
I sometimes use 18080 to quickly check progress and/or verify something
quick, it's been helpful.
I haven't used 18090.
It seems that the availability of that service has not been great but
improved, if it's on 99% of the time then we should keep one of them.
In parallel we need to work on hawkular.io which would be SaaS-like,
with data persisted and easy to upgrade when we want to. I have the
infrastructure (CPU/memory/disk) ready on public OS1 since last week, we
still need to deploy Hawkular and make Hawkular support tenants.
Thomas
On 04/30/2015 10:33 PM, Matthew Mahoney wrote:
Hawkular Community,
The JON QE team is querying feedback regarding the availability &
usefulness of the Public Hawkular Instances:
http://209.132.178.218:18080 (Try it out - "kick the tires
<http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kick_the_tires>")
http://209.132.178.218:18090 (On-demand build for Development /
Integration usage)
* Are either of these instances being used, and if so for what purpose?
* What can we do to make these instances more usable / useful?
Thanks!
Matt
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev