So does this mean the "feeds" in inventory should be renamed to
"agents", too?
I thought that we wanted to move away from using the word agent but frankly I
don't care too much.
On Monday, November 02, 2015 10:06:13 Thomas Heute wrote:
+1
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:02 AM, John Mazzitelli <mazz(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> As I'm writing code and docs and javadocs all around, I realize that the
> name of our "agent" is utterly confused. We need to fix this or we will
> eventually confuse users/customers.
>
> Right now in code, or comments, or docs, or just in talking, the names of
> the "agent" have been at one time or another:
>
> agent
> wildfly monitor
> wildfly hawkular feed
> wildfly monitor agent
> wildfly extension
> wildfly agent module
> wildfly agent
> etc. etc. etc.
>
> Over the weekend, I'm going to start renaming this so it is consistent
> across the board.
>
> It will be called "Hawkular WildFly Agent"
>
> This will affect maven artifact names moving forward. But we need to fix
> this now, because its confusing ME. I can only imagine the confusion when
> people start to ask "what do you call the hawkular thing that monitors
> Wildfly?"
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev