I was looking *exactly* at their code when I read your email :-) I'll
ping them, to see what's the best way to consume their module and to
check that it's even supported.
- Juca.
On 17.11.2015 17:53, Thomas Segismont wrote:
Le 17/11/2015 17:15, Juraci Paixão Kröhling a écrit :
> On 17.11.2015 17:07, John Sanda wrote:
>>> I’m fine with this as well. It is a step in the right direction; however, I
think ultimately we should be using the same physical session object since we are
communicating with the same physical cluster. To achieve this, I think a resource adapter
is likely the best solution, but I don’t yet have any experience with writing resource
adapters.
> While I also have no experience with that, I think I might have some
> free cycles for the next MS for it, so, I could handle that together
> with the kettle+accounts dist that was discussed on IRC some time ago.
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/TEIID/Cassandra+Data+Sources
It would be awesome to have CLI management of the session and to reuse
(if possible) what's been done next door :)
People who you might want to ping:
Jesper Pedersen
Emmanuel Bernard
Emmanuel Hugonnet
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev