Re: [Hawkular-dev] resteasy jackson or fasterxml jackson?

I have never used the org.codehaus.jackson packages. I always used the com.fasterxml.jackson.core ones in the context where I need to use directly the json library. Wildfly 9 we have the 2.5.1 version there. I tend to prefer the com.fasterxml and I remember to see that packages also in other components (that's main reason I used it). ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Burman" <miburman(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:47:20 AM > Subject: Re: [Hawkular-dev] resteasy jackson or fasterxml jackson? > > Hi, > > They're basically the same software. org.fasterxml is just a newer version of > Jackson. I'm surprised it's visible nearly anywhere.. resteasy-jackson2 > should use org.fasterxml? > > http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonRelease20 > > The change was done in 2012, org.codehaus stuff is from Jackson <2.0 and > isn't maintained (only the 2.x is maintained). And since Wildfly ships with > Jackson 2.4.1, I guess this is the version to go (and so does RESTeasy? > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-1100) > > - Micke > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Mazzitelli" <mazz(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:43:35 AM > Subject: [Hawkular-dev] resteasy jackson or fasterxml jackson? > > This is more for Lucas P, but wanted to put it out to the wider audience. > > I'm playing with JSON stuff, and now that we are not using gson, we have to > decide what jackson version we are going to use, because i just saw some > oddities on stuff I'm building because of the two different impls that are > available. > > Are we going to use the restasy jackson2 or the fasterxml jackson artifacts? > I think we need to consolidate on one (I mean, after all, we just got rid of > gson - so we are trying to consolidate on one JSON impl). And they are > technically two different impls because they are in two totally different > Java packages and so look like two different impls. This can bite us if we > aren't careful. > > I'm using fasterxml right now. I don't know if i'm going down the exact same > path that I did with gson (that is, using something no one else is). But my > problem is I believe the resteasy modules are NOT in WildFly Core, so that's > why I'm just pulling in the fasterxml artifacts directly rather than > depending on the resteasy module. > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev