Re: [Hawkular-dev] Future change in Inventory REST API - impacted clients?

Gracias Lucas I'm going to try testing manageiq's middleware spec... will probably ask for some help :) On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Lucas Ponce <lponce(a)redhat.com <mailto:lponce@redhat.com>> wrote: Also, I mean a *live* test from middleware_*.spec to the new changes. ManageIQ uses recorded cassettes with old versions of Hawkular Services. Lucas ----- Mensaje original ----- > De: "Lucas Ponce" <lponce(a)redhat.com <mailto:lponce@redhat.com>> > Para: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > Enviados: Martes, 22 de Noviembre 2016 9:49:21 > Asunto: Re: [Hawkular-dev] Future change in Inventory REST API - impacted clients? > > I think that ruby test suite should be enough. > > But just in case, before to submit the change it could be good if ManageIQ > tests are passing. > > Some ManageIQ code use the wrapped json code brought by the ruby client. > > I guess that if the middleware_*.spec are passing we are fine. > > Lucas > > ----- Mensaje original ----- > > De: "Joel Takvorian" <jtakvori(a)redhat.com <mailto:jtakvori@redhat.com>> > > Para: "Discussions around Hawkular development" > > <hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>> > > Enviados: Martes, 22 de Noviembre 2016 9:47:22 > > Asunto: [Hawkular-dev] Future change in Inventory REST API - impacted > > clients? > > > > Hi, > > > > There is a small upcoming change in the Inventory REST API which consists > > in > > removing a deprecated field, as explained in this JIRA: > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HWKINVENT-200 <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HWKINVENT-200> > > > > Basically, "type" has been replaced with "metricDataType" a while ago and > > made deprecated, now it's going to be removed. Probably not for the next > > release, but for the one after. Meanwhile I'd like to check any existing > > usage. What are the potential usages? > > > > - Ruby client: I've already made changes to it > > - Java client: it uses the inventory API code, so it should not require any > > change > > - Go client: does not use inventory (?) > > - Python client: does not use inventory (?) > > - I'm now having a look at WF & openshift agents > > > > Do you see anything else? > > > > Joel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hawkular-dev mailing list > > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev> > > > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev> > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev> _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev