Ahoj Filip, is there a reason to keep the document RH-internal? -- P
On 2015-08-13 13:53, Filip Brychta wrote:
Hello,
if the check fails please take a look at "What to do when the job fails"
section in
https://mojo.redhat.com/docs/DOC-1042661
Thanks,
Filip
----- Original Message -----
> Hello,
> Please be aware that second check (first is
> continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr) on each hawkular-metrics PR now finally
> does something useful.
>
> Following build
> (
http://jenkins.jonqe.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com:9080/job/haw-perf-stability-t...)
> is launched for each PR which will:
> 1 - build the PR
> 2 - build hawkular-dist using snapshot artifact from step 1
> 3 - deploy hawkular-dist
> 4 - start perf test which will
> - generate as high load as the hawkular is able to server. Right now from
> 300 threads where each thread is using unique tenantId.
> - measure average throughput (one request == POST one data point to
> http://${server.host}:${server.port}/hawkular/metrics/gauges/test/data and
> wait for response)
> - check % diff with previous build
> - if the % diff is < -2, it will fail the build. Right now it's still not
> 100% stable because of shared network, this problem should be fixed soon.
> Expected instability is now +/- 2 % so anything bigger than 2% should be
> considered as regression
> 5 - report status back to the PR
>
>
> So please from now on pay attention to result of that check and ping me if it
> fails.
> Consider this just as first step, there will be more next week since we have
> more time now (JON 3.3.3 is out).
>
> It would be nice if anybody could create a PR which would test this (just
> include some tiny sleep into request processing)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Filip
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev