[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2319) StatelessInterceptor
by Max Rydahl Andersen (JIRA)
StatelessInterceptor
--------------------
Key: HHH-2319
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2319
Project: Hibernate3
Type: New Feature
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.1
Reporter: Max Rydahl Andersen
It would make sense to have an Interceptor for StatelessSession to solve the following usecases:
Log/adjust SQL: onPrepareStatement
Proper entityname handling: instantiate/getEntity
Maybe also tx interaction: afterTransationBegin/beforeTransactionCompletion/afterTransactionCompletion
Technically it could be solved by just allowing to pass in a normal interceptor to a StatelessSession and just
document that the state oriented callbacks will not be called. Alternatively we can create a StatelessInterceptor that
only implement the releavant methods and wrap that instance into an internal Interceptor.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2007) Hibernate doesn't support optional one-to-one associations
by Andrei Iltchenko (JIRA)
Hibernate doesn't support optional one-to-one associations
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2007
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2007
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.0.cr2
Reporter: Andrei Iltchenko
Hibernate doesn't properly support optional one-to-one associations, e.g. Person (0..1) -- (0..1) Passport.
The Hibernate books and reference all talk of two ways of mapping one-to-one associations:
1. using a many-to-one fk association with a unique constraint on the fk;
2. using a pk association.
the trouble with both of them is that they enforce the mandatory property of an association end, which sometimes is not desirable. The first way enforces the mandatory property with the uniqueness constraint on the fk, the other by using the fact that one table's pk is its fk.
I tried to see if I could adapt the 1st way of representing one-to-ones to
support optional association ends. What I did was simply remove the unique and not null constrains from DDL generated (without removing it it would be impossible to have a Person record that doesn't reference a Passport record):
from
CREATE TABLE Person (
PassUniqueId VARCHAR (32) NOT NULL,
version INTEGER NOT NULL,
uniqueId VARCHAR (32) NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR (40) NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (uniqueId),
UNIQUE(PassUniqueId),
FOREIGN KEY (PassUniqueId) REFERENCES Passport (uniqueId)
);
to
CREATE TABLE Person (
PassUniqueId VARCHAR (32) NULL,
version INTEGER NOT NULL,
uniqueId VARCHAR (32) NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR (40) NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (uniqueId),
FOREIGN KEY (PassUniqueId) REFERENCES Passport (uniqueId)
);
but leave the uniqueness attribute in the mapping file:
<many-to-one
name="pass"
class="application.business.logic.Passport"
cascade="save-update,merge"
unique="true"
>
<column name="PassUniqueId"/>
</many-to-one>
The resulting solution worked fine and I was able to create instances of Person not linked to a Passport. However Hibernate didn't succed in keeping the association from degrading into a many-to-one. It enabled me to create two Persons linked with the same Passport:
PASSUNIQUEID | VIRSION | UNIQUEID | Name
================================================
0d8b3919fffff | 1 | 0d5fb1dcfff | John
0d8b3919fffff | 0 | 10fd07bdfff | Sam
A subsequent attempt at retrieving such Persons with Hibernate failed:
org.hibernate.HibernateException: More than one row with the given identifier was found: 0d8b3919ffffffd60151e135b6da0164, for class: application.business.logic.Passport.
Hibernate should be able to impose the single end property of such associations without relying on the underlying RDBMS engine and never allow them to degrade to many-to-ones.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2228) ant eg fails - bad release notes quick start
by Brian Brooks (JIRA)
ant eg fails - bad release notes quick start
--------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2228
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2228
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: documentation
Versions: 3.2.0.ga
Environment: hibernate 3.2.0.ga
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
java version "1.5.0_07"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_07-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_07-b03, mixed mode)
Reporter: Brian Brooks
Priority: Minor
The hibernate 3.2.0.ga release notes
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=455849&group_id=4...
read as
Get Up And Running Quick
------------------------
Demo:
(1) copy your JDBC driver to the lib directory
(2) edit etc/hibernate.properties
(3) run "ant eg" or "build eg"
(4) browse the sourcecode in eg/org/hibernate/auction
This directions are incorrect. Below is the ant output if these steps are followed. Also, I had to put junit*.jar and antlr*all*.jar in my ANT_HOME/lib before ant eg would work.
C:\hibernate-3.2>ant eg
Buildfile: build.xml
[taskdef] Could not load definitions from resource clovertasks. It could not b
e found.
eg:
[javac] Compiling 8 source files to C:\hibernate-3.2\build\eg
[javac] C:\hibernate-3.2\eg\org\hibernate\auction\Main.java:10: cannot find
symbol
[javac] symbol : class FetchMode
[javac] location: package org.hibernate
[javac] import org.hibernate.FetchMode;
[javac] ^
[javac] C:\hibernate-3.2\eg\org\hibernate\auction\Main.java:11: cannot find
symbol
[javac] symbol : class FlushMode
[javac] location: package org.hibernate
[javac] import org.hibernate.FlushMode;
[javac] ^
[javac] C:\hibernate-3.2\eg\org\hibernate\auction\Main.java:12: cannot find
symbol
[javac] symbol : class LockMode
[javac] location: package org.hibernate
[javac] import org.hibernate.LockMode;
[javac] ^
....
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HBX-849) Tools does not insert @Type in POJOs for user types defined in reveng.xml
by Zeljko Trogrlic (JIRA)
Tools does not insert @Type in POJOs for user types defined in reveng.xml
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HBX-849
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HBX-849
Project: Hibernate Tools
Type: Bug
Components: hbm2java, reverse-engineer
Environment: jboss-seam-1.1.0.GA, MySQL
Reporter: Zeljko Trogrlic
I have created reveng.xml file:
<hibernate-reverse-engineering>
<table
catalog="configuration"
name="userdb_domain_acl">
<column name="enabled" type="com.siemens.msm.model.mapping.BooleanEnumType" exclude="false"/>
</table>
</hibernate-reverse-engineering>
and included it in build.xml:
<jdbcconfiguration propertyfile="build.properties"
packagename="${model.package}"
revengfile="${project.home}/reveng.xml"/>
Generated POJO attribute has proper type, but user type information is missing:
@Column(name = "enabled")
@Length(max = 42)
public Boolean getEnabled() {
....
so Hibernate reports error:
3:49:31,397 INFO [TableMetadata] table found: configuration.userdb_domain_acl
13:49:31,397 INFO [TableMetadata] columns: [id, enabled, tablename, domain]
13:49:31,397 WARN [ServiceController] Problem starting service persistence.units:ear=msmgui.ear,unitName=msmgui
javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.hibernate.HibernateException: Wrong column type: enabled, expected: varchar(
2)
at org.hibernate.ejb.Ejb3Configuration.buildEntityManagerFactory(Ejb3Configuration.java:698)
at org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence.createContainerEntityManagerFactory(HibernatePersistence.java:127)
at org.jboss.ejb3.entity.PersistenceUnitDeployment.start(PersistenceUnitDeployment.java:264)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
Annotations should look like this:
@Column(name = "enabled")
@Type(type="booleanEnum")
public Boolean getEnabled() {
...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 7 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2131) SYBASE +select for update is showing deadlock because lock is not working properly
by George Thomas (JIRA)
SYBASE +select for update is showing deadlock because lock is not working properly
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2131
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2131
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.1.3
Environment: sybaseASE 12.5.03 in solaris +hibernate3.1.3
Reporter: George Thomas
I am connecting to Sybase database from hibernate.I tried setting locks using while selecting rows
1.session.load(class,id,LOCKMODE.UPGRADE)
2.session.lock(obj,LOCKMODE.UPGRADE)
I am attaching a sample code while updating a field in table fund after selecting it.
{
Fund fund = null;
ClientCredential credential = new ClientCredential("testDatabase", fund);
org.hibernate.Session session = SessionFactoryManager.getSessionFactory(credential).getCurrentSession();
Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
log.info("Run by " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
fund = (Fund) session.get(Fund.class, new Short((short)12), LockMode.UPGRADE);
fund.setLegalEntityOrgId(fund.getLegalEntityOrgId()+1);
transaction.commit();
}
my requirement was that i wanted to do a select for update.I should acquire lock on certain rows and do a matching and if concurrent request comes ,it should wait till transaction is over that is lock is released.
When I went through the hibernate code,the hibernate is making static queries in the beginning while loading session factory.Since we are appending the holdlock during execution,the sybase dialect is not appending.
As a work around I tested with native sql with holdlock but when I test concurrent request using threads its bombing.Its throwing LockAcquisitionException.( Your server command (family id #0, process id #3777) encountered a deadlock situation.).can anyone give a solution to this problem???
org.hibernate.exception.LockAcquisitionException: could not update: [com.citco.aexeo.common.dataaccess.domain.Fund#12]
at org.hibernate.exception.SQLStateConverter.convert(SQLStateConverter.java:84)
at org.hibernate.exception.JDBCExceptionHelper.convert(JDBCExceptionHelper.java:43)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.update(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2223)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.updateOrInsert(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2118)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.update(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2375)
at org.hibernate.action.EntityUpdateAction.execute(EntityUpdateAction.java:91)
at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.execute(ActionQueue.java:250)
at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.executeActions(ActionQueue.java:233)
at org.hibernate.engine.ActionQueue.executeActions(ActionQueue.java:140)
at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractFlushingEventListener.performExecutions(AbstractFlushingEventListener.java:297)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultFlushEventListener.onFlush(DefaultFlushEventListener.java:27)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.flush(SessionImpl.java:985)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.managedFlush(SessionImpl.java:333)
at org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction.commit(JDBCTransaction.java:107)
at com.satyam.Testing.doTransaction(Testing.java:103)
at com.satyam.MyRunnable.run(MyRunnable.java:13)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:568)
Caused by: com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybSQLException: Your server command (family id #0, process id #3777) encountered a deadlock situation. Please re-run your command.
at com.sybase.jdbc2.tds.Tds.processEed(Tds.java:2636)
at com.sybase.jdbc2.tds.Tds.nextResult(Tds.java:1996)
at com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.ResultGetter.nextResult(ResultGetter.java:69)
at com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybStatement.nextResult(SybStatement.java:204)
at com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybStatement.nextResult(SybStatement.java:187)
at com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybStatement.updateLoop(SybStatement.java:1642)
at com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybStatement.executeUpdate(SybStatement.java:1625)
at com.sybase.jdbc2.jdbc.SybPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(SybPreparedStatement.java:91)
at org.hibernate.jdbc.NonBatchingBatcher.addToBatch(NonBatchingBatcher.java:23)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.update(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2205)
... 14 more
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 7 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2374) setFetchMode() ignore incorect path
by Baptiste MATHUS (JIRA)
setFetchMode() ignore incorect path
-----------------------------------
Key: HHH-2374
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2374
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Versions: 3.2.0.ga
Environment: All DB I guess
Reporter: Baptiste MATHUS
This bug report is in fact a copy of the one that was already present in H2 : http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HB-763 . It does not seem to have changed in H3.
When calling setFetchMode("path", FetchMode.JOIN) on a criteria, even if the path is not correct, Hibernate does not complain. Its behaviour seems to be to simply ignore this bad path. I guess this should throw an exception. In fact, the bad thing of ignoring bad path is that if the developer was wrong specifying the path (typo, for example), then the join simply won't happen :-/.
I wrote a very simple testcase :
public void testFindClients()
{
Session session = HibernateUtil.currentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Client c = (Client)session.createCriteria(Client.class).setFetchMode("foo", FetchMode.JOIN)
.setFetchMode("foo.bar", FetchMode.JOIN).uniqueResult();
session.getTransaction().commit();
}
My Client class has some relationships with other classes, but obviously none named "foo". The code above just issue the following select :
select
this_.ID as ID0_0_,
this_.nom as nom0_0_,
this_.prenom as prenom0_0_,
this_.age as age0_0_
from
Client this_
Thanks again for your great work, guys!
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 8 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2344) Persistent collection queued operation ignored with lazy inverse one-to-many collection.
by Sebastien Robert (JIRA)
Persistent collection queued operation ignored with lazy inverse one-to-many collection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2344
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2344
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.1
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.1
Reporter: Sebastien Robert
I load an Object that contains a lazy inverse collection (one-to-many).
Hibernate wrap my collection with a PersistentMap
There is objects in the collection in the database but in my case the PersistentMap is not yet initialized.
I perform a remove operation on the persistentMap with a known key of one of the objects.
The map is not initialized (and the relation is an inverse one-to-many) so the map queue the removeOperation.
I perform a get operation with the same key and the value is still returned.
If we look closer at what happened in the PersistentMap, it's look like this.
//*****
public Object remove(Object key) {
if ( isPutQueueEnabled() ) { // This returned true, the
// map is not yet
// initialized
Object old = readElementByIndex( key ); // This method triggered
// an initialization of the
// map.
// Queued operation are
// processed in the after
// init method
queueOperation( new Remove( key, old ) ); // The remove operation
// is queued.
return old;
}
....
//*******
When i perform the get operation on the map the map is now initialized. The get is processed by the underlying map and the value is returned. The queued operation is completely ignored.
Currently i fixed my code by performing a containsKey before the remove . The containsKey initialize the map and then the remove do not queue the operation. But by looking at all the PersistentCollection it seem that i may have the same problem using put and remove with other persistentCollection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 8 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2068) TransientObjectException : object references an unsaved transient instance ...
by Ales PROCHAZKA (JIRA)
TransientObjectException : object references an unsaved transient instance ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2068
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2068
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.0.cr4
Environment: Windows, Hibernate 3.2.0.cr4, Oracle 9.2.0.1
Reporter: Ales PROCHAZKA
Attachments: XTest.zip
I found this problem:
If I create new object 'o1', which associate another persistent object 'o2' and by calling saveOrUpdate Hibernate throws PropertyValueException,
then when I corresct this property and try call saveOrUpdate in another session (in which 'o2' was not saved or loaded) Hibernate throws TransientObjectException.
Please see attached code :-)
This is a log :
Hibernate: select hibernate_sequence.nextval from dual
Hibernate: insert into T_TEST (A_POKUS, A_POKUS_LONG, CID, PK) values (?, ?, 3, ?)
Hibernate: insert into T_TEST3 (PK) values (?)
Hibernate: select hibernate_sequence.nextval from dual
Hibernate: select hibernate_sequence.nextval from dual
org.hibernate.PropertyValueException: not-null property references a null or transient value: persistent.Test5.pokus
at org.hibernate.engine.Nullability.checkNullability(Nullability.java:72)
at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractSaveEventListener.performSaveOrReplicate(AbstractSaveEventListener.java:284)
at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractSaveEventListener.performSave(AbstractSaveEventListener.java:180)
at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractSaveEventListener.saveWithGeneratedId(AbstractSaveEventListener.java:121)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.saveWithGeneratedOrRequestedId(DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.java:186)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.entityIsTransient(DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.java:175)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.performSaveOrUpdate(DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.java:98)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.onSaveOrUpdate(DefaultSaveOrUpdateEventListener.java:70)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.fireSaveOrUpdate(SessionImpl.java:509)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.saveOrUpdate(SessionImpl.java:501)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.saveOrUpdate(SessionImpl.java:497)
at test.MainTest.test(MainTest.java:71)
at test.MainTest.main(MainTest.java:42)
org.hibernate.TransientObjectException: persistent.Test3
at org.hibernate.engine.ForeignKeys.getEntityIdentifierIfNotUnsaved(ForeignKeys.java:216)
at org.hibernate.type.EntityType.getIdentifier(EntityType.java:108)
at org.hibernate.type.ManyToOneType.isDirty(ManyToOneType.java:221)
at org.hibernate.type.TypeFactory.findDirty(TypeFactory.java:476)
at org.hibernate.persister.entity.AbstractEntityPersister.findDirty(AbstractEntityPersister.java:2900)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultFlushEntityEventListener.dirtyCheck(DefaultFlushEntityEventListener.java:474)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultFlushEntityEventListener.isUpdateNecessary(DefaultFlushEntityEventListener.java:197)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultFlushEntityEventListener.onFlushEntity(DefaultFlushEntityEventListener.java:120)
at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractFlushingEventListener.flushEntities(AbstractFlushingEventListener.java:195)
at org.hibernate.event.def.AbstractFlushingEventListener.flushEverythingToExecutions(AbstractFlushingEventListener.java:76)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultFlushEventListener.onFlush(DefaultFlushEventListener.java:26)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.flush(SessionImpl.java:993)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.managedFlush(SessionImpl.java:340)
at org.hibernate.transaction.JDBCTransaction.commit(JDBCTransaction.java:106)
at test.MainTest.test(MainTest.java:87)
at test.MainTest.main(MainTest.java:42)
Thanx
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 8 months