Strange versions in branches/jbosstools-2.0.x
by Marshall Culpepper
Hey guys..
I ran through and changed all the versions in 2.0.x branch to 2.0.1, but
wanted to note a few inconsistencies I saw when running through:
- A number of plugins had their versions listed as 2.1.0 originally:
- jsf.vpe.ajax4jsf, jsf.vpe.facelets, jsf.vpe.richfaces,
jsf.vpe.seam, jsf.vpe.tomahawk
- vpe, vpe.ui.palette, vpe.xulrunner (obsolete?)
I changed these back to 2.0.1 as I'm guessing they were changed in
anticipation of the 2.1 release before being the branch was created.
Also, I noticed that the o.j.t.hibernate.hblibs plugin is still using
"old" Eclipse 3.0/2.1 style plugin.xml (with no MANIFEST.MF). Is there
any reason for that?
Max - What do you want the "base" version of Hibernate Tools to be for
this release? 3.2.1 ?
--
Marshall Culpepper
JBoss Developer Studio, JBoss Tools
marshall(a)jboss.org
16 years, 8 months
QA Daily report 06 March 2008
by Aliaksey Nis
Hello Denis,
This is Daily QA report for 06 March 2008.
Tasks performed:
1. Hibernate and JBoss-esb testing at latest 2.1 JBossTools builds.
2. Test cases review. Adding new functionality tests.
--
Best regards,
Aliaksey mailto:anis@exadel.com
16 years, 8 months
Tagging for 2.0.1
by Marshall Culpepper
Hey Denis..
Are we ready to start tagging for 2.0.1? The unit test rate has been
pretty stable and the only errors I see seem to be Resource API related
(maybe related to the the Hibernate JDT UI tests themselves)
--
Marshall Culpepper
JBoss Developer Studio, JBoss Tools
marshall(a)jboss.org
16 years, 8 months
VPE Tests on dev91-linux
by Denis Golovin
Max, Marshall,
I tested all available JVM to get it up, but nothing helped. Next reason
why it fails the OS. I noticed that dev91-linux is running under
os.version 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp
I'd like to try it on dev65-linux or any other host that have Enterprise
Linux 5
Should we ask QA permission for that?
Thanks
Denis
16 years, 8 months
