Re: [jbosstools-dev] m2e 1.6.2 RC1 and m2e 1.7.0 M1 are available
On 19 Aug 2015, at 23:14, Paul Leacu wrote:
Hey Max -
I've got the updated JBTIS TP about ready to go. I've mirrored
the m2e 1.6.2 and I'm picking
up graphiti 0.13.0 from a mirror as well. I'm trying to get the TP
put together so Brian can try
building Switchyard tomorrow. Then I should be able to handoff to QE
the JBDSIS 9.0.0.Alpha1 on
Friday. The TP changes are well marked and will definitely get
removed as soon as the 4.50.0 JBDS
core TP is ready.
Here's the Jira:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-472
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-20384
Thanks Paul! That was the missing link :)
Good we found a way, but lets not make a habit of doing overrides in
JBDS-IS TP.
Another example where if we had a fully automated way of doing
updates/builds we could react
much faster and sane to these kind of things which no matter our good
intentions will always pop up.
/max
--paull
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Nick Boldt" <nboldt(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Paul Leacu" <pleacu(a)redhat.com>, "Fred Bricon"
> <fbricon(a)gmail.com>, "jbosstools-dev"
> <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 4:58:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] m2e 1.6.2 RC1 and m2e 1.7.0 M1 are
> available
>
> On 19 Aug 2015, at 17:34, Nick Boldt wrote:
>
>> Yes, but we won't be updating our 4.50.0.CR1-SNPASHOT tp for another
>> 2
>> weeks, in order to collect more Mars.1 (previously called Mars SR1)
>> changes at the same time.
>>
>> Paul's agreed to simply pull the 1.6.2 bits into his TP directly
>> (since he needs it for his Alpha release this week). He's already
>> doing that w/ Graphiti 0.13, so it's no big whoop to do it for
>> another
>> almost-in-Mars.1 project, too.
>
> eh..wat? did not see any notice about this m2e issue being related to
> JBDS-IS ?
>
> In past having JBDS-IS duplicate/change core dependencies was a big
> no-no
> and are we sure this will actually work when running an
> update/install
> on top ?
>
> Just seems it would be way simpler we respun our TP with the right
> bits
> rather
> than we have to remember to retract this from the JBTIS/JBDS-IS TP in
> their next
> update.
>
>> We can of course update it sooner / a few times, but less churn is
>> better, unless you're worried that devs need to start using
>> something
>> from Mars.1 SOONER than 2 weeks from now?
>
> well, you just mentioned JBDS-IS apparently needs it now not later ?
>
> /max
> http://about.me/maxandersen
>
/max
http://about.me/maxandersen