Re: [jbosstools-dev] Known issues w/ JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1 & DS 10.0.0.Alpha1 bits staged for QE

Hey - I've been building a local JBTIS TP based on Neon. We have a chicken-and-egg issue with IS dependency on JBT core. Now that we've got a staging version I should have an Alpha1 JBTIS TP released this week.

--paull ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: "Nick Boldt" <nboldt(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 3:55:58 AM > Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Known issues w/ JBT 4.4.0.Alpha1 & DS > 10.0.0.Alpha1 bits staged for QE > > On 2 May 2016, at 2:43, Nick Boldt wrote: > >> I could remove it from the ide-config.properties, sure, but in the >> absence of instructions from Paul, Alexey, or yourself, I just >> assumed >> we'd use the current staged IS bits for Mars in the current JBT/DS >> staged bits for Neon. >> And in doing so, something went awry, as >> reported in the above JIRAs. >> >> We don't have a clear policy for what to do when starting the Alphas >> for a new JBT/DS when there are no IS bits available. We should >> probably write one. > > The clear policy we have is to not mix up Eclipse release train TP > sites > (unless properly vetted and tested for sanity). > > Been the same for years IMO. > > So if you are waiting for me to say something: If integration stack > cannot be installed > into Neon without problems - please remove Integration Stack > setup for Neon until IS itself can provide a working solution or > judge > if the problem is tolerable. > Do please notify Paul about the change in a jira and mail so he knows > about it. > > > /max > >> >> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen >> <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>> So for now, JBTIS content can't be installed into JBT >>>> 4.4.0.Alpha1, >>>> but that's OK because anything we'd be installing is the >>>> Mars-based >>>> stuff, not the Neon-based stuff. >>> >>> >>> Not following the logic in that statement. Installing mars based is >>> what we >>> would >>> expect at this time since no Neon available, but we shouldn't be >>> pointing to >>> something >>> that adds a Eclipse Mars based TP. Why is IS not just removed from >>> our Neon >>> metadata >>> until it has working setup so we avoid adding Mars update sites ? >>> >>> /max >>> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> >> -- >> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat >> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio >> http://nick.divbyzero.com > > > /max > http://about.me/maxandersen > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >