Re: [jbosstools-dev] Locus Repository Usage
Hi Rob,
From a maintenance point-of-view, it would certainly improve matters
for Teiid Designer since I have
to update Designer's clone of the
integration-stack-base.target every time a new build of locus is made.
However, there is a strong possibility in the future that locus will carry multiple
versions of the
same plugins, eg. saxon 9.2.1 (current in locus) and 9.4 (current released stable). In
that
scenario, JBT-IS will have to specify both versions if some projects use one version and
some
projects use another version. How likely this is remains a good question!
Regards
PGR
On 07/31/2013 06:00 PM, Rob Cernich wrote:
Hey all,
Recently, the JBTIS builds were broken and after a little analysis it appears the culprit
is Locus. After looking at how JBTIS is using Locus, I'm wondering if the target
files for JBTIS are incorrect.
Currently, the target files declare specific artifact versions, but specify the root
locus repository URL. Besides the fact that the JBTIS TP is pointing to the
"integration" repository for Locus, I'm wondering if it would be better if
we pointed at a specific version of Locus and simply specified the artifacts without
version. This would require less maintenance of the TP and should make the build more
stable. That said, the solution would only work if it is acceptable to version the
dependencies based on a specific version of Locus. Is this acceptable?
Reference:
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-integration-stack/blob/master/ta...
Specific plugin versions would go to 0.0.0, while the repository URL would go to
.../stable/locus/<some-version>.
Thanks in advance,
Rob
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Paul Richardson
* p.g.richardson(a)phantomjinx.co.uk
* p.g.richardson(a)redhat.com
* pgrichardson(a)linux.com
"I know exactly who reads the papers ...
* The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country.
* The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country.
* The Times is read by people who do actually run the country.
* The Daily Mail is read by the wives of the people who run the country.
* The Financial Times is read by the people who own the country.
* The Morning Star is read by the people who think the country ought to be run by
another country.
* The Daily Telegraph is read by the people who think it is."
Jim Hacker, Yes Minister