Re: [jbosstools-dev] Proposed change to JBT target platform 4.40.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT: PowerMock

Max, Reference https://github.com/jcantrill/jbosstools-openshift/commits/jbide_17919_sna... for how I used it to resolve the issue. In regards to the importance, I don't really have a context to the schedule or priority. I suspect, however, the request could wait as the issue I resolved was identified as low priority; I pulled it from the queue in order to get my feet wet with the source code. The alternative would be to split the change into test and code and push the tests in a later commit. This is not ideal IMO but it would eliminate the dependency in the short term.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Mickael Istria" <mistria(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "jbosstools-dev jbosstools-dev" <jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 3:20:18 AM Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] Proposed change to JBT target platform 4.40.0.CR1-SNAPSHOT: PowerMock On 20 Aug 2014, at 9:11, Mickael Istria wrote: > On 08/20/2014 09:09 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> we are in CR phase - why are adding powermock at this time ? > I let you discuss with Jeff Cantrill about how much goodness it > provides and conclude whether we include it or not (so whether we > also > include Jeff's patches or not). I definitely can see its goodness - but I we have issues like https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-14315 with Mockito that makes changing its version and change where it and this powermock comes from problematic. /max http://about.me/maxandersen _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev