A new repository for bot tests?
Why not
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-integration-tests/ ?
On 01/31/2013 12:31 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
> what do you think about having new git repository for SOA related bot tests?
We should be using integration-stack now instead of just SOA :)
> SOA tests include bpel, jbpm, modeshape, teiid designer etc. And these components are
independently released.
> Now, the soa tests are in jbosstools-integration-tests together with jbt core tests.
>
> The problem is that the next soa release will be for juno, so I'm developing
tests under Juno.
> It means committing to jbosstools-4.0.x branch while people for JBT core commit to
the master branch (Kepler).
> But what happens when I start developing soa tests for Kepler? Possibly commit my
juno changes to kepler branch.
Yes, you merge them down.
> What happens when there is another eclipse release? It seams that I will be still
behind the master branch :(
That is/will hopefully change.
> Another reason is that soa tests have nothing in common with core tests. Everyone is
still dividing the tools into core and soa.
> So, lets start discussing about pros and cons ;-)
Well, technically it is fine/ok for this but I can see the advantage of creating a
jbosstools-integration-stack-test repo (or similar named) as
these tests would be related to jbosstools-integration-stack releases.
It also maps to the notion of having coretests and integrationstacktests updatesites for
dev/build testing.
So I'm +1 on doing a split - but still need to solve the reddeer/botext scenario and
you would still have similar job of working in different branches in this stack
since both 4.0.x and 4.1 stuff will be active.
/max
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
http://nick.divbyzero.com