Re: [jbosstools-dev] Xulrunner downgraded for x64 in repository.jboss.org

So we should actually just have moved to 1.8.1.4 when we realized that ? /max > Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> This should be up to the VPE team to decide. >> >> I would prefer one version used across the board. >> >> Why was 1.8.1.4 used instead of 1.8.1.3 ? >> >> > Because we weren't able to compile 1.8.1.3 version on x86 platform. > > /sergey > >> /max >> >> >> >>> Hi all: >>> >>> I've up-loaded a down-graded version of xulrunner over at >>> http://repository.jboss.org/xulrunner/ >>> >>> The reason for this is so that we may (if it's not impossible) use a >>> matching xulrunner release across all jbds and jbosstools releases. >>> Previously, the x64 release was 1.8.1.4 rather than the standard 1.8.1.3 >>> used in windows, linux, and osx. >>> >>> Whether this can be worked into the build for 2.1.0 GA, or the update >>> site, or not, remains to be seen. But I just wanted to make sure this is >>> a possibility for GA. Personally, *I* hope it makes it in... but with >>> the xulrunner version being technically lower than the old, anyone >>> already using the product would have to manually downgrade the file in >>> the plugins folder. Not exactly a great situation. >>> >>> Parity? Or ease of use? Which will win? >>> >>> - Rob Stryker >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbosstools-dev mailing list >>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev >> >> >