Re: 2.1.x / 1.1.x branch builds
by Denis Golovin
... and it seems I had fixed tests issue yesterday
The reason was:
[java] [javac] ----------
[java] [javac] 59. ERROR in /home/hudson/hudson_workspace/workspace/jbosstools-2.1.x/jbds-build/eclipse/plugins/org.jboss.tools.seam.ui.test/src/org/jboss/tools/seam/ui/test/jbide/JBide2277Test.java (at line 54)
[java] [javac] assertTrue(p.getDisplayString().startsWith(SeamELProposalProcessor.EL_START_EXPRESSION));
[java] [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[java] [javac] SeamELProposalProcessor.EL_START_EXPRESSION cannot be resolved
it is fixed now. We'll see what how it works during next build when
conf2-linux will available.
Denis
Marshall wrote:
> The latest JBossTools 2.1.x branch build is now available at :
> http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/builds/2.1.x/nightly/200806182342-ni...
>
>
> And JBDS 1.1.x branch build (behind VPN):
> http://reports.qa.atl.jboss.com/binaries/RHDS/1.1.x/nightly/200806190155-...
>
>
16 years, 6 months
looking at the seam pages.xml editor
by Max Rydahl Andersen
Hi,
I'm looking around in the seam pages xml editor (the graphical part).
I got a couple of quesitons about it ;)
1) If we are not using GMF why is EMF model then interesting for the graphical part ?
2) Isn't alot of this code inside org.jboss.tools.seam.ui.pages direct copies of existing code ?
e.g. the ConnectionRouter and alot of the common code in the EditParts looks very familiar ?
Shouldn't we consolidate this kind of code instead of keep duplicating it ?
3) Any reason why we are using arbitrary numbers in all the layout/painting ? :) e.g. 31, 21, 50 and 18 does not say much.
(note: I'm currently fixing this one since they hurt me alot when trying to update the graphics to be more light/less-bulky)
/max
16 years, 6 months
