Re: [jbosstools-dev] CDI/Seam security xml weirdness

I'm not convinced that's an error. In that case the docs and examples would be wrong. Do you get errors using the nonimpl class at runtime ?

Remember the whole point is that you can configure beans abstractly and then at runtime they are instantiated with the concrete instances. /max (sent from my phone) On 07/10/2011, at 18.54, Viacheslav Kabanovich<scabanovich(a)exadel.com> wrote: > Hi, Max > > org.jboss.seam.security.Identity is an interface and cannot be configured as a managed bean in config xml. > org.jboss.seam.security.IdentityImpl is ok to be configured. > > I added validation that marks configuring abstract types as errors in JBIDE-9834 last week. > > Slava > > On 10/07/2011 04:53 AM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >> Hi Slava/Alexey, >> >> Have you seen this thread: http://seamframework.org/Community/SecurityCannotResolveMemberInNodeSecur... >> referenced from http://community.jboss.org/message/630545#630545 >> >> It sounds very wrong that the Impl name is the correct one. >> >> Is the tool not validating wrong here ? >> >> /max >> http://about.me/maxandersen >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jbosstools-dev mailing list >> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev