Thanks for mentioning that Denis (M.), and also thanks to you for your
investigation and help on this bug ;)
On 04/03/2012 01:04 PM, Denis Maliarevich wrote:
FYI,
the related jira is JBIDE-11360
<
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-11360>.
3 апреля 2012 г. 12:08 пользователь Mickael Istria <mistria(a)redhat.com
<mailto:mistria@redhat.com>> написал:
Hi Denis,
Thanks for investigating on this; and even more, for sharing
conclusions. It is a pity I could not detect this side-effect by
myself. It's also a pity I get this feedback so late, I thought
introducing such a regression would have been the cause of
immediate complaints. IMHO, it shows Jenkins is under-used by most
people.
About coverage, it's up to people who consume these coverage
reports to decide what they need/want. I am afraid all this
coverage things are currently not used at all, so no-one would
care in case we remove Emma or Jacoco.
Currently, we still have to use Emma if we want coverage since we
don't have a way to get "continuous" reports easily with Jacoco
(BTW Max made some tentative usage of Sonar, and Jonathan Fuerth
submitted a GSoC subject for a Jacoco plugin in Jenkins).
Then I think the wiser and simpler solution would be to disable
Jacoco.
We can think of Jacoco as a progress since it allows developers to
consume reports directly in their IDE (see a 3-weeks older mail of
mine for more details). But, once again, nobody use it, so we can
ignore it.
In a mid to long term view, we will get rid of Emma to use only
Jacoco.
Currently, we are stuck to Emma and then it seems like we need to
disable Jacoco. I do that immediatly in parent.
Regards,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <
http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <
http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<
http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_______________________________________________
jbosstools-dev mailing list
jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:jbosstools-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev