Why not just have an icon next to Server 1 that just signals stopped,
starting, started, stopping ?
What is that "nifty little animation" you mention ?
/max
Server 1
| - State: Started
| - Modules
| - Event Log
| - Descriptor XPaths
| - blah blah blah
Server 2
| - State: Stopped
| - Modules
| - blah blah
Server 3
| - State: Starting
| - et etc etc
Clearly this isn't optimal to quickly see which servers are
started or
stopped.
And finally, my server view extension API was written to accept a
changing
input for the second viewer. It was not written to be a child of several
different elements, but rather to be stand-alone elements with a changing
input.
Hopefully this gives you some insight into what was going through my tiny
programmer mind.
- Rob
On 11/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)jboss.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:09:40 +0100, Rob Stryker <rob.stryker(a)jboss.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Because I was told much earlier that two views is crap, one is ideal.
> > Users
> > dont want tons of views opened to do somethign that was previously
> > controlled by a launch configuration.
>
> the two views argument i understand...so why not just have one tree ?
>
> I don't understand your launch configuration point is for ? We still
> have that...
>
> /max
>
> >
> > On 11/13/06, Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)jboss.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> #1
> >> >> Eclipse WTP has this notion of "Adding an applicaiton" to
a
> server.
> >> Does
> >> >> this also automatically
> >> >> add source lookup to that server ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > AFAIK no.. but this is something that might be possible to code in
> >> > ourselves
> >> > for our adapter (Rob would know for sure)
> >>
> >> If not, how do they handle the "disable breakpoints" on server
> feature
> >> if
> >> they don't somehow get info about the source ?
> >> (look in the wtp server preferences)
> >>
> >> > #2
> >> >> We have this splitted jbosserver view with what looks to me a
> >> filtered
> >> >> WTP
> >> >> server view and specific jboss bottm part, correct ?
> >> >> Why is there both a mix of jboss inc servers and jboss wtp servers
> >> >> visible
> >> >> in that one ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Well IMO this should be JBoss servers only as it is the "JBoss
> Server
> >> > View"
> >> > ..
> >>
> >> Why not just reuse the existing WTP view and have the jboss specific
> >> things in another view ?
> >> (just curious)
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> Max Rydahl Andersen
> >> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
> >>
> >> Hibernate
> >> max(a)hibernate.org
> >>
http://hibernate.org
> >>
> >> JBoss a division of Red Hat
> >> max.andersen(a)jboss.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jbosside-dev mailing list
> >> jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Max Rydahl Andersen
> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
>
> Hibernate
> max(a)hibernate.org
>
http://hibernate.org
>
> JBoss a division of Red Hat
> max.andersen(a)jboss.com
>
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
max(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
JBoss a division of Red Hat
max.andersen(a)jboss.com