Please report in a JIRA w/ build log snippet and steps to reproduce. :P
On 06/16/2010 03:21 AM, Andersen Max wrote:
would not build.
/max
On Jun 15, 2010, at 19:25, Nick Boldt wrote:
> Define foobar? Would not build? Corrupt files in svn?
>
> On 06/10/2010 01:27 PM, Andersen Max wrote:
>> btw. drools were foobar for me in both trunk and branch but no changes in there
afaics.
>>
>> /max
>>
>> On Jun 10, 2010, at 18:57, Andersen Max wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I completed the merge. We are now on Eclipse 3.6 in trunk.
>>>
>>> Everything compiles, but I haven't tested that everything runs all fine
yet.
>>>
>>> Things I noticed:
>>> trunk/build/ and its content (especially build.xml) were semantically
different - Nick ?
>>>
>>> vpe had conflicting edits as discussed on irc; i've applied all incoming
stuff from helios - VPE team please check that it is as expected.
>>>
>>> documentation were edited in a few places, looked like isaac thought he were
commiting to 3.1.x - did not merge it over. - Ben/Isaac can you look ?
>>>
>>> I have to go for today, but Nick said he would monitor the builds and see if
there are big fires to fix - but otherwise we
>>> are now on 3.6 and 3.2.helios branch is dead.
>>>
>>> I'm going to clean up jira tomorrow morning to reflect this.
>>>
>>> Thanks for listening,
>>> /max
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosstools-dev mailing list
>> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
>
> --
> Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
> Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools& Dev Studio
> Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling& Dash Athena
>
http://nick.divbyzero.com
> _______________________________________________
> jbosstools-dev mailing list
> jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev
--
Nick Boldt :: JBoss by Red Hat
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
Release Engineer :: Eclipse Modeling & Dash Athena