Guys, The only tag I've received is Koen's for jBPM. Denis/Rob/Max are you guys tagging your components in JBossTools SVN? Marshall Culpepper wrote: > Hey guys, > > It's that time again.. > > All the component leads will need to create tags under our /tags > directory for their respective components. As a refresher, make sure > to use the following format in tagging: > > If your module name is "hibernate-tools", your tag should look > something like: > > /tags/hibernate-tools-${RELEASE} > -- hibernate-tools/ > ---- plugins/ > ---- features/ > > The key is to keep your module's folder name under the tag, so, the > following would be wrong: > > /tags/hibernate-tools-${RELEASE} > -- plugins/ > -- features/ >

Ok - the tag for hibernatetools is: https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbosstools/tags/TOOLS_3_2_0_beta11 freemarker hasn't changed so not retagging. /max > Hi Marshall, > > Had a few issues to iron out yesterday. > > I was wondering when we get these tags done how I (and everyone else > developing) can most easily get a checkout that corresponds to what > will be in jboss tools Beta2 ? > > Will we have to do individual checkout of each versioned "component" > ? That's going to be hard to maintain... > > /max > >> Guys, >> >> The only tag I've received is Koen's for jBPM. Denis/Rob/Max are you >> guys tagging your components in JBossTools SVN? >> >> Marshall Culpepper wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> It's that time again.. >>> >>> All the component leads will need to create tags under our /tags >>> directory for their respective components. As a refresher, make >>> sure to use the following format in tagging: >>> >>> If your module name is "hibernate-tools", your tag should look >>> something like: >>> >>> /tags/hibernate-tools-${RELEASE} >>> -- hibernate-tools/ >>> ---- plugins/ >>> ---- features/ >>> >>> The key is to keep your module's folder name under the tag, so, the >>> following would be wrong: >>> >>> /tags/hibernate-tools-${RELEASE} >>> -- plugins/ >>> -- features/ >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ jbosstools-dev mailing list jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev

It might be better if you only group components that interact a lot.. i.e... I could see grouping common, jst, jsf, and vpe into a "richfaces" tag... but the others i think deserve their own tag directory.. Denis Golovin wrote: > Should I create tag for > > common > jst > jsf > seam > shale > struts > vpe > > components? > > It can be jbosstools_2_0_0_beta2. > > Denis