[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-3499) Model for JBoss ESB configuration
by John Graham (JIRA)
Model for JBoss ESB configuration
---------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-3499
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3499
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: esb
Affects Versions: 3.0.0.GA
Reporter: John Graham
Assignee: John Graham
Fix For: LATER
We need a domain model (perhaps EMF based) for JBoss ESB configuration files. This model should be versioned, as the JBoss ESB configuration file is likely to evolve in future releases.
This model would then be used by tools interacting with JBoss ESB configuration, including service editors, testing tools, impact analysis, and so on.
Need to consider extensibility dimensions for actions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-2399) Validation of ESB files for specific SOA-P versions
by John Graham (JIRA)
Validation of ESB files for specific SOA-P versions
---------------------------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-2399
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-2399
Project: Tools (JBoss Tools)
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: esb
Reporter: John Graham
Assigned To: John Graham
Given that the SOA-P run time will change from release to release, we need some generic way of validating ESB files in Eclipse projects for specific run time versions. This might be done at the package level (that is, when creating a deployment package), but ideally would be done "live:" as the user makes changes, warnings/errors would appear in the Eclipse Problems view. To accomplish this, we would need to set a (minimum? probably not, because backward compatibility is not supported) "SOA-P run time level" (like the JVM level) and have a validation model for checking. The idea is to avoid simple compatibility errors appearing at run time where they could have been noticed at design time.
(This is related to, but larger than, the ESB reference tracking work.)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 10 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-4732) The summary of BPEL validator issue
by Denny Xu (JIRA)
The summary of BPEL validator issue
-----------------------------------
Key: JBIDE-4732
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-4732
Project: JBoss Tools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: bpm
Affects Versions: 3.1.0.M3
Reporter: Denny Xu
Assignee: Denny Xu
Fix For: 3.1.0.M3
so far, the bpel validator still has the following issues not get fixed:
1. before validate bpel resource, the validator is unable to delete all bpel problem markers which created by bpel validator, it only delete the related markers in .bpel files, but it should not be the right logic, when validating a bpel file, it validates all the bpel file referenced other types of files, such .wsdl and .xsd file,
so that if validate the same file *n* times, the same bpel problem markers will have *n* records in the problem view.
2. after validate bpel resource, only the markers of .bpel file can be located to the accurate line number position when double click relevant markers.
3. when checking xpath function, the return type of those functions are *Integer*, such as the function concat(string str1, string str2) , then it generates a type
un-compatible warning message.
4. it seems the validator doesn't support to validate xpath2.0
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 10 months