we actually have the exact same challenge in tooling land - the trouble of classifying
what "status"
an external plugin has for us/users.
We currently use the term "Certified" and "Selected" as the way to say
which we support/can help fix things on and "selected" being those
we at least tested at some point but might have changed since then.
/max
On 29 Aug 2012, at 13:58, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all,
James P has started to develop some designs for this:
<JDFApproved3.jpg>
I really like the bottom left (though it's possible that supported is not the right
term, perhaps "Recommended" or "Certified" is better?)
On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:08, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
> Exactly why I like Jason's proposal of using the JDF logo explicitly.
>
> On 2012-07-10, at 11:07 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> Well we want to rate them based on their level of affiliation, not on their
quality or difficulty.
>>
>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 16:04, Marius Bogoevici wrote:
>>
>>> Something based on the JDF logo would be better. I don't think we want to
*rate* examples, we just want to indicate their degree of affiliation with jdf.
>>>
>>> On 2012-07-10, at 10:25 AM, Jason Porter wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about rendering the jdf "logo" as a stamp? with some specs
on it or ink areas missing?
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "Jonathan Fuerth" <jfuerth(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:53:37 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>>>>
>>>>> That could work.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll see if I can do some mockups.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 Jul 2012, at 14:50, Jonathan Fuerth wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A gold starburst "Official Supported JBoss Demo" would
convey this
>>>>>> idea to me. Kind of like the Nintendo Seal of Quality.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for the lesser-supported scenarios, I'm not sure we need a
mark
>>>>>> for that. The absence of the official seal might be enough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or, if the supported demos get an Official Seal, maybe the
>>>>>> in-the-works demos could get the industrious Soon-to-be-official
>>>>>> Beaver of Quality, and the unsupported demos could get the
>>>>>> completely unofficial Otter of Quality. (ha, ha, ha.. OK,
I'll
>>>>>> stop now.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Pete Muir" <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> To: jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:08:45 AM
>>>>>> Subject: [jdf-dev] Looking for a (visual) metaphor
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need a visual metaphor that quickly conveys to people that an
>>>>>> example is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * official, and something we will stand by, answer questions on,
>>>>>> support in a product (e.g. TicketMonster)
>>>>>> * something that we plan to add to as an official example later
on
>>>>>> (e.g. jbossworld keynote 2012)
>>>>>> * something that is really interesting, but is unlikely to be
>>>>>> official (e.g. Vineet's example)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We had thought about using ski run colours (green circle, blue
>>>>>> square, black diamond) to indicate the level, but they really
>>>>>> refer more to difficulty than to recommendation. Anyone got any
>>>>>> good ideas?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>> jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
jdf-dev mailing list
jdf-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev