August 2011 - switchyard-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-435) Provide a stand-alone "installer" to add SwitchYard to an existing AS7 install

by Keith Babo (JIRA)

Provide a stand-alone "installer" to add SwitchYard to an existing AS7 install ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: SWITCHYARD-435 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-435 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Feature Request Components: distribution Reporter: Keith Babo Fix For: 0.3 It would be nice to have a way to add the SwitchYard modules and other resources to an existing AS7 installation. This does not have to be a full-blown installer. It could just be another distro with an ant script or maybe a maven pom that takes the bits and slaps them into AS7. This shouldn't be much more than copying in modules, updating the standalone configuration (maybe give the user a choice of the config - e.g. standalone, standalone-preview), deploying our admin console, etc., etc. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-434) Update BPMMixIn to use the TestMixIn lifecycle methods (initialize() and uninitialize()) to start and stop the bpm task server

by Tom Fennelly (JIRA)

Update BPMMixIn to use the TestMixIn lifecycle methods (initialize() and uninitialize()) to start and stop the bpm task server ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: SWITCHYARD-434 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-434 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Enhancement Reporter: Tom Fennelly Tests that currently look like... {code} public class HelpDeskTests { private BPMMixIn bpm; private HTTPMixIn http; @Test public void testHelpDesk() throws Exception { if (bpm.startTaskServer("Developer", "User")) { try { http.postResourceAndTestXML("http://localhost:18001/HelpDeskService", "/xml/soap-request.xml", "/xml/soap-response.xml"); boolean keepWorking = true; while (keepWorking) { keepWorking = bpm.completeTasksForUsers("Developer", "User"); } } finally { bpm.stopTaskServer(); } } } } {code} Would end up looking like... {code} public class HelpDeskTests { private BPMMixIn bpm; private HTTPMixIn http; @Test public void testHelpDesk() throws Exception { http.postResourceAndTestXML("http://localhost:18001/HelpDeskService", "/xml/soap-request.xml", "/xml/soap-response.xml"); boolean keepWorking = true; while (keepWorking) { keepWorking = bpm.completeTasksForUsers("Developer", "User"); } } } {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-433) Allow XSDs to be resolved from a SwitchYard runtime installation

by Rob Cernich (JIRA)

Allow XSDs to be resolved from a SwitchYard runtime installation ---------------------------------------------------------------- Key: SWITCHYARD-433 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-433 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Enhancement Components: tooling Reporter: Rob Cernich Assignee: Rob Cernich The current Eclipse plugin provides a static XML catalog to help the Eclipse XML validator resolve SwitchYard XSDs. Ideally, this plugin should dynamically resolve schema from an associated SwitchYard runtime installation, if one exists. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-432) Resolve XML validation errors in HornetQ test files

by Rob Cernich (JIRA)

Resolve XML validation errors in HornetQ test files --------------------------------------------------- Key: SWITCHYARD-432 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-432 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Rob Cernich Priority: Minor Fix remaining XML validation errors in HornetQ component test files. The files in question are: /switchyard-component-hornetq/src/test/resources/org/switchyard/component/hornetq/config/model/v1/hornetq-all-binding.xml /switchyard-component-hornetq/src/test/resources/org/switchyard/component/hornetq/config/model/v1/hornetq-valid-implementation.xml The first file barfs on "browseOnly" which is not defined in the schema. I'm not sure if this element should be removed from the test file or added to the schema (and incorporated into the binding activator). The second file defines a HornetQ implementation for a service component. A HornetQ implementation element is not defined in the HornetQ schema. I'm assuming the HornetQ schema should be modified to include an implementation definition, but I'm not sure. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-431) Resolve XML validation errors in Camel test files

by Rob Cernich (JIRA)

Resolve XML validation errors in Camel test files ------------------------------------------------- Key: SWITCHYARD-431 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-431 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Bug Components: component-camel Reporter: Rob Cernich Priority: Minor Fix remaining XML validation errors in Camel component's test files. The files in question are: /switchyard-component-camel/src/test/resources/org/switchyard/component/camel/config/model/v1/switchyard-atom-binding.xml /switchyard-component-camel/src/test/resources/org/switchyard/component/camel/config/model/v1/switchyard-direct-binding-beans.xml The first file should probably include a model validation check in its unit test. The second file can probably be deleted. (The file used by the direct tests has the same name, but in a different directory.) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-430) Model merge does not merge schemaLocation attributes

by Rob Cernich (JIRA)

Model merge does not merge schemaLocation attributes ---------------------------------------------------- Key: SWITCHYARD-430 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-430 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Bug Components: configuration Reporter: Rob Cernich Priority: Optional Unit tests in switchyard-config use local test schema that are resolved using a relative URI. When the test schema are merged, the schemaLocation attribute on the resulting document does not contain all the locations specified. Because of this, the document used to validate the merge contains errors. The files in question are: /switchyard-config/src/test/resources/org/switchyard/config/model/composite/CompositeModelTests-Complete.xml /switchyard-config/src/test/resources/org/switchyard/config/model/switchyard/SwitchYardModelTests-Complete.xml -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-429) Projects with XSLT transforms fail because schema definition is missing

by Keith Babo (JIRA)

Projects with XSLT transforms fail because schema definition is missing ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: SWITCHYARD-429 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-429 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Bug Components: transformation Affects Versions: 0.2 Reporter: Keith Babo Assignee: Keith Babo Priority: Blocker Fix For: 0.2 transform-v1.xsd is missing an element declaration for transform.xslt. This causes any project with an XSLT tranform to fail build due to the recent change to enable validation in configure and in the test kit. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-428) Defining resources as classes in @Process and @Rules is clunky

by David Ward (JIRA)

Defining resources as classes in @Process and @Rules is clunky -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: SWITCHYARD-428 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-428 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Bug Components: common, component-bpm, component-rules Affects Versions: 0.2 Reporter: David Ward Assignee: David Ward Fix For: 0.3 Using the switchyard maven plugin and the BPMSwitchYardScanner, the following BPM component configuration: <component name="MyService"> <implementation.bpm processDefinition="META-INF/MyService.bpmn" processDefinitionType="BPMN2" processId="MyService"> <taskHandler class="org.switchyard.component.bpm.task.SwitchYardServiceTaskHandler" name="SwitchYard Service"/> <resource location="/META-INF/MyServiceRules.drl" type="DRL"/> </implementation.bpm> <service name="MyService"> <interface.java interface="org.switchyard.userguide.MyService"/> </service> </component> can be auto-generated from this: @Process(value=MyService.class, resources={MyServiceRules.class}) public interface MyServiceProcess extends MyService { public static final class MyServiceRules extends SimpleResource { public MyServiceRules() { super("/META-INF/MyServiceRules.drl", "DRL"); } } } Similarly, using the switchyard maven plugin and the RulesSwitchYardScanner, the following Rules component configuration: <component name="MyService"> <implementation.rules stateful="false"> <rulesAction name="process" type="EXECUTE_RULES"/> <resource location="/org/switchyard/userguide/MyService.drl" type="DRL"/> </implementation.rules> <service name="MyService"> <interface.java interface="org.switchyard.userguide.MyService"/> </service> </component> can be auto-generated from this: @Rules(value=MyService.class, resources={MyServiceDrl.class}) public interface MyServiceRules extends MyService { @ExecuteRules public void process(MyData data); public static final class MyServiceDrl extends SimpleResource { public MyServiceDrl() { super("/org/switchyard/userguide/MyService.drl", "DRL"); } } } The problem is that using a CLASSES array (of static classes) to define resources is VERY clunky, and causes the user to write a lot more code than he/she needs to. Instead, the resources array of the Rules annotation should instead just be an array of STRINGS pointing to the location of the resources. The original reasoning behind using classes was that there were two different pieces of data to describe a resource: a location and a type. However, as part of this work, if we add a way for the ResourceType class (which already exists and is extensible to user-added types) to deduce the type via the file extension, then just the location would be required. With this change, the above BPM code would be reduced to this: @Process(value=MyService.class, resources={"/org/switchyard/userguide/MyService.drl"}) public interface MyServiceProcess extends MyService {} , and the above Rules code would be reduced to this: @Rules(value=MyService.class, resources={"/org/switchyard/userguide/MyService.drl"}) public interface MyServiceRules extends MyService { @ExecuteRules public void process(MyData data); } A lot cleaner! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-427) SwitchYardFacet should validate config xml

by David Ward (JIRA)

SwitchYardFacet should validate config xml ------------------------------------------ Key: SWITCHYARD-427 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-427 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Bug Components: configuration, tooling Affects Versions: 0.2 Reporter: David Ward Assignee: David Ward Fix For: 0.3 Similar to how the ConfigureMojo of the Maven SwitchYard plugin validates the outputted model configuration xml by default, but has an option to disable it, the SwitchYardFacet should also validate it's outputted xml, most likely triggered by writeSwitchYardConfig(). It is important that this can be disabled, though, in case the user plans on post-processing the xml to make it valid. Here is how the ConfigureMojo does it: http://goo.gl/Kgebe -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (SWITCHYARD-426) userguide has invalid config model xml

by David Ward (JIRA)

userguide has invalid config model xml -------------------------------------- Key: SWITCHYARD-426 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-426 Project: SwitchYard Issue Type: Bug Components: configuration, distribution, docs Reporter: David Ward Assignee: David Ward Fix For: 0.2 Now that we enforce valid config model xml, the userguide docs should be updated to actually SHOW valid config model xml, instead of examples that are invalid. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

13 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

switchyard-issues August 2011