7:01 a.m.
I see. We can consider doing something like this - I guess what I have asked people to do
initially is equivalent to the feasibility check. We can open it up to the community for
after the kick off con call and get their feedback on whether we are going in the right
direction. How does that sound?
On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:57, Mark Struberg wrote:
The EG and extended EG first worked through all the Jira issues and
did some documentation and feasibility checks. Before finishing the spec he called for
feedback in the community basically asking them to vote for the jira issues (directly in
jira) they see as most important to get fixed.
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/edburns/archive/2011/04/25/vote-your-top-fiv...
http://java.net/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10523
Actually your own uidata issue comes out on top ;)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
> To: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
> Cc: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:49 AM
> Can you briefly explain the system he
> used?
>
> On 27 Apr 2011, at 12:47, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Pete!
>>
>> What do you think about a public voting as Ed did with
> JSF-2.2?
>> Could give some good feedback.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> --- On Wed, 4/27/11, Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Peter Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
>>> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1
>>> To: "cdi-dev" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
>>> Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011, 11:25 AM
>>> Hi everyone
>>>
>>> Welcome to the CDI 1.1 expert group. I've started
> to
>>> collect some resources at https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki. Please take
some
>>> time to read through them.
>>>
>>> I would like everyone to work their way through
> the various
>>> lists of issues in JIRA https://github.com/pmuir/cdi/wiki/CDI-1.1-issues and
> do
>>> four things:
>>>
>>> * If you are aware of an issue that is not
> recorded, please
>>> create one
>>> * If you think an issue on the TBC list should be
> addressed
>>> in CDI 1.1 then please make a note of this, and
> prepare an
>>> email to this list explaining why you think the
> issue should
>>> be included. Please restrict yourself to three
> such issues.
>>> * If you think an issue on the proposed list
> shouldn't be
>>> addressed then please make a note of this, and
> prepare an
>>> email to this list explaining why you think the
> issue
>>> shouldn't be included. Please restrict yourself to
> three
>>> such issues.
>>> * Write a note to the list indicating what issues
> you are
>>> going to take a lead on. For major issues, prepare
> a 2
>>> minute summary for the concall so that you can
> brief people
>>> on the issue.
>>>
>>> The (soft) deadline for this exercise is Wednesday
> 11th
>>> May. Of course, we can continue to debate the
> merits of
>>> issues after this, but to make things run smoothly
> it will
>>> help a lot if we can get this done quickly!
>>>
>>> I propose we have conference call on Thursday 12th
> May to
>>> kick off, overview the main issues facing us and
> run through
>>> who will take what issues. Here is my proposed
> slot -
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CDI+Kick+off+con...
>>> - it's difficult to find something suitable for
> everyone,
>>> but this does allow both people in Australia (late
> night)
>>> and the US West Coast (our two extremes) to
> particpate.
>>>
>>> Any comments or suggestions welcome,
>>>
>>> Pete
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>
>
>